Explaining arguments with background knowledge

• Verfasst von: Becker, Maria [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hulpuş, Ioana [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Opitz, Juri [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Paul, Debjit [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kobbe, Jonathan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Stuckenschmidt, Heiner [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Frank, Anette [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Explaining arguments with background knowledge
• Verf.angabe: Maria Becker, Ioana Hulpuş, Juri Opitz, Debjit Paul, Jonathan Kobbe, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Anette Frank
• E-Jahr: 2020
• Jahr: 06 July 2020
• Umfang: 11 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 12.08.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Datenbank-Spektrum
• Ort Quelle: Berlin : Springer, 2001
• Jahr Quelle: 2020
• Band/Heft Quelle: 20(2020), 2, Seite 131-141
• ISSN Quelle: 1610-1995
• DOI: doi:10.1007/s13222-020-00348-6
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1766533523
• K10plus-PPN:
  Universitätsbibliothek
• Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Abstract

Most information we consume as a society is obtained over the Web. News - often from questionable sources - are spread online, as are election campaigns; calls for (collective) action spread with unforeseen speed and intensity. All such actions have argumentation at their core, and the conveyed content is often strategically selected or rhetorically framed. The responsibility of critical analysis of arguments is thus tacitly transferred to the content consumer who is often not prepared for the task, nor aware of the responsibility.