Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Mühlbauer, Julia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [VerfasserIn]   i
 Walach, Margarete [VerfasserIn]   i
 Porubský, Štefan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wessels, Frederik [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nuhn, Philipp [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wagener, Nina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kriegmair, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Partial nephrectomy preserves renal function without increasing the risk of complications compared with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinomas of stages pT2-3a
Verf.angabe:Julia Mühlbauer, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Margarete T. Walach, Stefan Porubsky, Frederik Wessels, Philipp Nuhn, Nina Wagener and Maximilian C. Kriegmair
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:11 August 2020
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 20.08.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: International journal of urology
Ort Quelle:Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1997
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:27(2020), 10, Seite 906-913
ISSN Quelle:1442-2042
Abstract:Objectives To compare the operative and functional result of partial and radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinomas of stages pT2-3a. Methods Consecutive patients with renal cell carcinoma of stages pT2-3a, cN0 and cM0, who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy between January 2005 and October 2019 at a tertiary care center were included. Data were collected retrospectively. End-points included severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3), acute and chronic renal function impairment, and overall survival. Uni- and multivariable outcome analyses were based on logistic regression. Results A total of 158 patients were included (110 radical nephrectomy and 48 partial nephrectomy). Over time, partial nephrectomy was increasingly used. A RENAL score ≥10 was the only independent predictor influencing the surgical approach (radical nephrectomy vs partial nephrectomy, odds ratio 8.62, 95% confidence interval 3.32-22.37, P < 0.001). No significant differences in complications for radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy were found (12.7% vs 8.3%, P = 0.424). Renal function was better preserved in the partial nephrectomy group (the latest chronic kidney disease stage ≥3: radical nephrectomy 73% vs partial nephrectomy 41%, P = 0.005). The surgical approach was a significant factor for chronic kidney disease (odds ratio 51.07, 95% confidence interval 3.57-730.59, P = 0.004). Overall survival did not significantly differ between radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy (mean overall survival 85.86 months, 95% confidence interval 3.83-78.36 vs 81.28 months, 95% confidence interval 4.59-72.29, P = 0.702). Conclusions In selected patients, partial nephrectomy can be used in large or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. Compared with radical nephrectomy, it allows better preservation of renal function without harboring an increased risk of severe postoperative complications.
DOI:doi:10.1111/iju.14326
URL:Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14326
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/iju.14326
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14326
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:chronic kidney disease
 complications
 partial nephrectomy
 radical nephrectomy
 renal cell carcinoma
K10plus-PPN:1767510454
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68772484   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang