Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Mohsenpour, Amir [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bozorgmehr, Kayvan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rohleder, Sven [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stratil, Jan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Costa, Diogo [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:SARS-Cov-2 prevalence, transmission, health-related outcomes and control strategies in homeless shelters
Titelzusatz:systematic review and meta-analysis
Verf.angabe:Amir Mohsenpour, Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Sven Rohleder, Jan Stratil, Diogo Costa
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:23 July 2021
Umfang:20 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 03.11.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: EClinicalMedicine
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2018
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:38(2021) vom: Aug., Artikel-ID 101032, Seite 1-20
ISSN Quelle:2589-5370
Abstract:Background - People experiencing homelessness (PEH) may be at risk for COVID19. We synthesised evidence on SARS-Cov-2 infection, transmission, outcomes of disease, effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), and the effectiveness of strategies for infection prevention and control (IPC). - Methods - Systematic review of articles, indexed in electronic databases (EMBASE, WHOCovid19, Web of Science), institutional websites and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health's live map of COVID-19 evidence, and published from December 1st, 2019, to March 3rd, 2021. Empirical papers of any study design addressing Covid-19 and health(-related) outcomes in PEH or shelters’ staff were included. (PROSPERO-2020-CRD42020187033) - Findings - Of 536 publications, 37 studies were included (two modelling, 31 observational, four qualitative studies). Random-effect meta-analysis yields a baseline SARS-Cov-2 prevalence of 2•32% (95% Confidence-Interval, 95%CI=1•30-3•34) in PEH and 1•55% (95%CI=0•79-2•31) in staff. In outbreaks, the pooled prevalence increases to 31•59% (95%CI=20•48-42•71) in PEH and 14•80% (95%CI=10•73-18•87) in staff. Main IPC strategies were universal rapid testing, expansion of non-congregate housing, and in-shelter measures (bed spacing, limited staff rotation, reduction in number of residents). - Interpretation - 32% of PEH and 15% staff are infected during outbreaks of SARS-Cov-2 in homeless shelters. Most studies were conducted in the USA. No studies were found quantifying health-related outcomes of NPI. Overview and evaluation of IPC strategies for PEH, a better understanding of disease transmission, and reliable data on PEH within Covid-19 notification systems are needed. Qualitative studies may serve to voice PEH and shelter staff experiences, and guide future evaluations and IPC strategies. - Funding - None.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101032
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101032
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537021003126
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101032
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:COVID-19
 homeless shelters
 Meta-analysis
 people experiencing homelessness
 SARS-CoV-2
 systematic review
K10plus-PPN:177599662X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68796113   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang