Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schnepf, Julia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Christmann, Ursula [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:“It's a war! It's a battle! It's a fight!”
Titelzusatz:do militaristic metaphors increase people's threat perceptions and support for COVID-19 policies?
Verf.angabe:Julia Schnepf, Ursula Christmann
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:02 September 2021
Umfang:20 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 04.11.2021 ; Epub ahead of print
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: International journal of psychology
Ort Quelle:Chichester [u.a.] : Wiley, 1966
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:?(2021), ?, Seite 1-20
ISSN Quelle:1464-066X
Abstract:At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world employed militaristic metaphors to draw attention to the dangers of the virus. But, do militaristic metaphors truly affect individuals' perceived threat of the COVID-19 virus and increase their support for corresponding restrictive policies? This study assessed the effects of fictitious newspaper articles that described COVID-19 policies using similarly negatively valenced metaphors but with differing militaristic connotations (e.g., “war” vs. “struggle”). Overall, data from three framing experiments (N = 1114) in Germany and the United States indicate limited evidence on the effectiveness of the tested militaristic metaphors. In the U.S. context, the non-militaristic concept of struggle was consistently more strongly associated with the desired outcomes than militaristic metaphors were. In Studies 2 and 3, we also tested whether reporting using a narrative or straightforward facts had additional influence on the framing effect. A congruency effect of the use of a narrative and of warfare metaphors was found in the German sample, but not in that of the United States. Results of post-experimental norming studies (N = 437) in both countries revealed that the metaphor of war is associated with people ascribing greater responsibility to their governments, whereas the concept of struggle triggers a sense of individual responsibility. These results are discussed in terms of the usefulness and appropriateness of militaristic metaphors in the context of a pandemic.
DOI:doi:10.1002/ijop.12797
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12797
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ijop.12797
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12797
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:COVID-19
 Health communication
 Metaphor framing
 Policy support
K10plus-PPN:1776217829
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68796943   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang