Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Freundt, Emma Pauline [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sauer, Sandra [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kriegsmann, Mark [VerfasserIn]   i
 Staemmler, Henrike [VerfasserIn]   i
 Egerer, Gerlinde [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kriegsmann, Katharina [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Accuracy and reliability of internet resources for information on monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
Titelzusatz:what information is out there for our patients?
Verf.angabe:Emma Pauline Kreutzer, Sandra Sauer, Mark Kriegsmann, Henrike Staemmler, Gerlinde Egerer, Katharina Kriegsmann
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:7 September 2021
Umfang:18 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 10.11.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Cancers
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2009
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:13(2021), 18, Artikel-ID 4508, Seite 1-18
ISSN Quelle:2072-6694
Abstract:Background: Online information gathering can increase patients’ engagement in decision-making. The quality of online resources available for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was evaluated. Methods: 900 websites from Google, Bing, Yahoo, and 150 YouTube videos were assessed. Results: The websites did not differ regarding their search rank or between the search engines. The median time since last update was 24 months. The 86 unique websites showed a medium to poor general quality (JAMA score 3/4, only 8.1% websites with a valid HON certificate). The patient- (user-) focused quality was poor (sum DISCERN score 27/80 points). The reading level was difficult (11th US school grade). The content level was very low (13/50 points). 12.8% of websites contained misleading/wrong facts. Websites provided by scientific/governmental organizations had a higher content level. For the 61 unique videos, the median time since upload was 34 months. The videos showed a medium general quality (HON Foundation score). The patient- (user-) focused quality was poor (sum DISCERN score 24 points). The content level was very low (6 points). Conclusion: MGUS-relevant online sources showed a low quality that was provided on a high reading level. Incorporation of quality indices and regular review of online content is warranted.
DOI:doi:10.3390/cancers13184508
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184508
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/18/4508
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184508
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)
 online health information
 patient education
K10plus-PPN:1777172888
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68800028   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang