Imaging modalities employed in diabetic retinopathy screening

• Verfasst von: Kanclerz, Piotr [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Tuuminen, Raimo [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Khoramnia, Ramin [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Imaging modalities employed in diabetic retinopathy screening
• Titelzusatz: a review and meta-analysis
• Verf.angabe: Piotr Kanclerz, Raimo Tuuminen and Ramin Khoramnia
• E-Jahr: 2021
• Jahr: 29 September 2021
• Umfang: 27 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 06.12.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Diagnostics
• Ort Quelle: Basel : MDPI, 2011
• Jahr Quelle: 2021
• Band/Heft Quelle: 11(2021), 10, Artikel-ID 1802, Seite 1-27
• ISSN Quelle: 2075-4418
• DOI: doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101802
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: diabetic macular edema
• Sach-SW: diabetic retinopathy
• Sach-SW: fundus photography
• Sach-SW: mydriatic photography
• Sach-SW: screening
• Sach-SW: smartphone-based imaging
• Sach-SW: ultra-wide-field scanning laser ophthalmoscope
• K10plus-PPN: 1780404514

Abstract

Introduction: Urbanization has caused dramatic changes in lifestyle, and these rapid transitions have led to an increased risk of noncommunicable diseases, such as type 2 diabetes. In terms of cost-effectiveness, screening for diabetic retinopathy is a critical aspect in diabetes management. The aim of this study was to review the imaging modalities employed for retinal examination in diabetic retinopathy screening. Methods: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were the main sources used to investigate the medical literature. An extensive search was performed to identify relevant articles concerning “imaging”, “diabetic retinopathy” and “screening” up to 1 June 2021. Imaging techniques were divided into the following: (i) mydriatic fundus photography, (ii) non-mydriatic fundus photography, (iii) smartphone-based imaging, and (iv) ultrawide-field imaging. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the performance and technical failure rate of each method. Results: The technical failure rates for mydriatic and non-mydriatic digital fundus photography, smartphone-based and ultrawide-field imaging were 3.4% (95% CI: 2.3-4.6%), 12.1% (95% CI: 5.4-18.7%), 5.3% (95% CI: 1.5-9.0%) and 2.2% (95% CI: 0.3-4.0%), respectively. The rate was significantly different between all analyzed techniques (p < 0.001), and the overall failure rate was 6.6% (4.9-8.3%; I2 = 97.2%). The publication bias factor for smartphone-based imaging was significantly higher than for mydriatic digital fundus photography and non-mydriatic digital fundus photography (b = −8.61, b = −2.59 and b = −7.03, respectively; p < 0.001). Ultrawide-field imaging studies were excluded from the final sensitivity/specificity analysis, as the total number of patients included was too small. Conclusions: Regardless of the type of the device used, retinal photographs should be taken on eyes with dilated pupils, unless contraindicated, as this setting decreases the rate of ungradable images. Smartphone-based and ultrawide-field imaging may become potential alternative methods for optimized DR screening; however, there is not yet enough evidence for these techniques to displace mydriatic fundus photography.