Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Egerer, Gerlinde [VerfasserIn]   i
 Goldschmidt, Hartmut [VerfasserIn]   i
 Salwender, Hans [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hegenbart, Ute [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ehrhard, Ingrid [VerfasserIn]   i
 Haas, Rainer [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ho, Anthony Dick [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Efficacy of continuous infusion of ceftazidime for patients with neutropenic fever after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
Verf.angabe:Gerlinde Egerer, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Hans Salwender, Ute Hegenbart, Ingrid Ehrhard, Rainer Haas, Anthony D Ho
E-Jahr:2000
Jahr:July 2000
Umfang:5 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 21.12.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: International journal of antimicrobial agents
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1991
Jahr Quelle:2000
Band/Heft Quelle:15(2000), 2, Seite 119-123
ISSN Quelle:1872-7913
Abstract:Neutropenia is an important complication of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Neutropenic patients presenting with fever are routinely hospitalized for treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Neutropenia up to 10 days is associated with a low-risk profile, and antimicrobial therapy administered on an outpatient basis might be an alternative to admission to hospital. This prospective study evaluates the safety of a continuous infusion of ceftazidime in neutropenic patients after HDCT and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). From September 1995 to October 1999, 81 patients received a 2 g intravenous bolus of ceftazidime, followed by a 4 g continuous infusion per 24 h of ceftazidime using a portable infusion pump. If the fever persisted for 72 h, a glycopeptide antibiotic was added. The median patients’ age was 44 years. Fifty-two of 81 patients (64%) responded to the monotherapy with ceftazidime. After addition of a glycopeptide antibiotic, a further 17 patients (21%) became afebrile. The causes of fever were septicaemia in 11 patients, pneumonia in two and fever of unknown origin in 68 patients. Fifty-eight episodes (72%) were successfully managed by outpatient treatment alone. The reason for admission to hospital was the change to imipenem/cilastin, which had to be administered three times per day (12 patients), severe mucositis with parenteral nutrition (eight patients), or a Karnovsky index ≤60 (three patients). In six of these cases, outpatient treatment was resumed after a brief period of in-patient care. In no case was the treatment terminated because of failure of the pump. With daily follow-up and close monitoring for development of complications, it is possible to discharge patients earlier after HDCT and PBSCT, thereby decreasing costs.
DOI:doi:10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00155-2
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00155-2
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857900001552
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00155-2
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Ceftazidime
 High-dose chemotherapy
 Neutropenia
 Outpatient treatment
K10plus-PPN:1782686916
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68849327   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang