Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Haun, Markus W. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hoffmann, Mariell [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wildenauer, Alina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Tönnies, Justus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wensing, Michel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Szecsenyi, Joachim [VerfasserIn]   i
 Peters-Klimm, Frank [VerfasserIn]   i
 Krisam, Regina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kronsteiner, Dorothea [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hartmann, Mechthild [VerfasserIn]   i
 Friederich, Hans-Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Health providers’ experiences with mental health specialist video consultations in primary care
Titelzusatz:a qualitative study nested within a randomised feasibility trial
Verf.angabe:Markus W. Haun, Mariell Hoffmann, Alina Wildenauer, Justus Tönnies, Michel Wensing, Joachim Szecsenyi, Frank Peters-Klimm, Regina Krisam, Dorothea Kronsteiner, Mechthild Hartmann, Hans-Christoph Friederich
Jahr:2021
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Online issue publication November 09, 2021 ; Gesehen am 22.12.2021
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: BMJ open
Ort Quelle:London : BMJ Publishing Group, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:11(2021), 11, Artikel-ID e047829, Seite 1-8
ISSN Quelle:2044-6055
Abstract:<h3>Objective</h3> <p>Despite available effective treatments for mental health disorders, few patients in need receive even the most basic care. Integrated telepsychiatry services may be a viable option to increase access to mental healthcare. The aim of this qualitative process evaluation embedded in a randomised controlled feasibility trial was to explore health providers’ experiences with a mental healthcare model integrating mental health specialist video consultations (MHSVC) and primary care.</p><h3>Methods</h3> <p>A qualitative process evaluation focusing on MHSVC in primary care was conducted. In 13 semistructured interviews, we assessed the experience of all mental health specialists, primary care physicians and medical assistants who participated in the trial. A thematic analysis, focusing on the implementation, mechanisms of impact and context, was applied to investigate the data.</p><h3>Results</h3> <p>Considering (1) the implementation, participants evaluated the consultations as feasible, easy to use and time saving. Concerning (2) the mechanisms of impact, the consultations were regarded as effective for patients. Providers attributed the patients’ improvements to two key aspects: the familiarity of the primary care practice and the fast access to specialist mental healthcare. Mental health specialists observed trustful therapeutic alliances emerging and described their experience as comparable to same-room care. However, compared with same-room care, specialists perceived the video consultations as more challenging and sometimes more exhausting due to the additional effort required for establishing therapeutic alliances. Regarding (3) the intervention’s context, shorter travel distances for patients positively affected the implementation, while technical failures, that is, poor Internet connectivity, emerged as the main barrier.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3> <p>MHSVCs in primary care are feasible and successful in improving access to mental healthcare for patients. To optimise engagement and comfort of both patients and health providers, future work should focus on empirical determinants for establishing robust therapeutic alliances with patients receiving MHSVC (eg, leveraging non-verbal cues for therapeutic purposes).</p><h3>Trial registration number</h3> <p>DRKS00015812; Results.</p>
DOI:doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047829
URL:kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047829
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/11/e047829
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047829
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1783519908
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68852770   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang