Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Poß-Doering, Regina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kühn, Lukas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kamradt, Martina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stürmlinger, Anna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Glassen, Katharina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Andres, Edith [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wambach, Veit [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bader, Lutz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Szecsenyi, Joachim [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wensing, Michel [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Fostering appropriate antibiotic use in a complex intervention
Titelzusatz:mixed-methods process evaluation alongside the cluster-randomized trial ARena
Verf.angabe:Regina Poss-Doering, Lukas Kühn, Martina Kamradt, Anna Stürmlinger, Katharina Glassen, Edith Andres, Petra Kaufmann-Kolle, Veit Wambach, Lutz Bader, Joachim Szecsenyi and Michel Wensing
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:8 December 2020
Umfang:20 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 17.02.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Antibiotics
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:9(2020), 12, Artikel-ID 878, Seite 1-20
ISSN Quelle:2079-6382
Abstract:The cluster randomized trial ARena (sustainable reduction of antibiotic-induced antimicrobial resistance, 2017-2020) promoted appropriate use of antibiotics for acute non-complicated infections in primary care networks (PCNs) in Germany. A process evaluation assessed determinants of practice and explored factors associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns. This work describes its findings on uptake and impacts of the complex intervention program and indicates potential implementation into routine care. In a nested mixed-methods approach, a three-wave study-specific survey for participating physicians and medical assistants assessed potential impacts and uptake of the complex intervention program. Stakeholders received a one-time online questionnaire to reflect on network-related aspects. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews, with a purposive sample of physicians, medical assistants and stakeholders, explored program component acceptance for daily practice and perceived sustainability of intervention component effects. Intervention components were perceived to be smoothly integrable into practice routines. The highest uptake was reported for educational components: feedback reports, background information, e-learning modules and disease-specific quality circles (QCs). Participation in PCNs was seen as the motivational factor for guideline-oriented patient care and adoption of new routines. Future approaches to fostering appropriate antibiotics use by targeting health literacy competencies and clinician’s therapy decisions should combine evidence-based information sources, audit and feedback reports and QCs.
DOI:doi:10.3390/antibiotics9120878
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120878
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/12/878
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120878
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:appropriate antibiotics use
 mixed-methods
 primary care
 quality improvement
K10plus-PPN:1789496586
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68877717   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang