Mental health burden in different professions during the final stage of the COVID-19 lockdown in China

• Verfasst von: Du, Junfeng [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Mayer, Gwendolyn [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hummel, Svenja [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Oetjen, Neele [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Gronewold, Nadine [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Zafar, Ali [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Mental health burden in different professions during the final stage of the COVID-19 lockdown in China
• Titelzusatz: cross-sectional survey study
• Verf.angabe: Junfeng Du, MSc; Gwendolyn Mayer, DipPsych; Svenja Hummel; Neele Oetjen, MSc; Nadine Gronewold, MSc; Ali Zafar, MA, MSc; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz, PD, Dr med
• E-Jahr: 2020
• Jahr: 02.12.20
• Umfang: 14 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 16.02.2022
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of medical internet research
• Ort Quelle: Richmond, Va. : Healthcare World, 1999
• Jahr Quelle: 2020
• Band/Heft Quelle: 22(2020), 12, Artikel-ID e24240, Seite 1-14
• ISSN Quelle: 1438-8871
• DOI: doi:10.2196/24240
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1789590809

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 resulted in considerable mental health burden in the Chinese general population and among health care workers at the beginning and peak of the pandemic. However, little is known about potentially vulnerable groups during the final stage of the lockdown. - Objective: The aim of this survey study was to assess the mental health burden of different professions in China in order to find vulnerable groups, possible influencing factors, and successful ways of coping during the last 4 weeks of the lockdown in Hubei Province. - Methods: A cross-sectional online survey asked participants about current residence, daily working hours, exposure to COVID-19 at work, and media preferences. We used a shortened version of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) to assess mental health. Further assessments included perceived stress (Simplified Chinese version of the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale), coping strategies for all participants, and specific stressors for health care workers. We followed the reporting guidelines of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement for observational studies. - Results: The sample (N=687) consisted of 158 doctors, 221 nurses, 24 other medical staff, 43 students, 60 teachers/government staff, 135 economy staff, 26 workers/farmers, and 20 professions designated under the “other” category. We found increased depression (n=123, 17.9%), anxiety (n=208, 30.3%), and stress (n=94, 13.7%) in our sample. Professions that were vulnerable to depression were other medical staff and students. Doctors, nurses, and students were vulnerable to anxiety; and other medical staff, students, and economy staff were vulnerable to stress. Coping strategies were reduced to three factors: active, mental, and emotional. Being female and emotional coping were independently associated with depression, anxiety, or stress. Applying active coping strategies showed lower odds for anxiety while mental coping strategies showed lower odds for depression, anxiety, and stress. Age, being inside a lockdown area, exposure to COVID-19 at work, and having a high workload (8-12 hours per day) were not associated with depression, anxiety, or stress. WeChat was the preferred way of staying informed across all groups. - Conclusions: By the end of the lockdown, a considerable part of the Chinese population showed increased levels of depression and anxiety. Students and other medical staff were the most affected, while economy staff were highly stressed. Doctors and nurses need support regarding potential anxiety disorders. Future work should focus on longitudinal results of the pandemic and develop targeted preventive measures. - Trial Registration: