Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schütz, Viktoria [VerfasserIn]   i
 Reimold, Philipp [VerfasserIn]   i
 Görtz, Magdalena [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hofer, Luisa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Dieffenbacher, Svenja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne [VerfasserIn]   i
 Duensing, Stefan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hohenfellner, Markus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hatiboglu, Gencay [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Evolution of salvage radical prostatectomy from open to robotic and further to Retzius sparing surgery
Verf.angabe:Viktoria Schuetz, Philipp Reimold, Magdalena Goertz, Luisa Hofer, Svenja Dieffenbacher, Joanne Nyarangi-Dix, Stefan Duensing, Markus Hohenfellner and Gencay Hatiboglu
Jahr:2022
Umfang:10 S.
Fussnoten:Published: 30 December 2021 ; Gesehen am 18.02.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:11(2022), 1, Artikel-ID 202, Seite 1-10
ISSN Quelle:2077-0383
Abstract:Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) has evolved from open to minimally invasive approaches. sRP can be offered to patients with local recurrence to improve biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and overall survival. We evaluate oncological outcome and continence after retropubic (RRP), conventional (cRARP), and Retzius-sparing robotic (rsRARP) surgery. Materials/methods: A total of 53 patients undergoing sRP between 2010 and 2020 were included. Follow-up included oncological outcome and continence. Results: sRP was done as RRP (n = 25), cRARP (n = 7), or rsRARP (n = 21). Median blood loss was 900 mL, 500 mL, and 300 mL for RRP, cRARP, and rsRARP, respectively. At 12 months, 5 (20%), 0, and 4 (19%) patients were continent, 9 (36%), 3 (43%), and 7 (33%) had grade 1 incontinence, 5 (20%), 2 (29%), and 3 (14%) had grade 2 incontinence, and 3 (12%), 2 (29%), and 4 (19%) had grade 3 incontinence for RRP, cRARP, or rsRARP, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 52.6 months, 16 (64%), 4 (57%), and 3 (14%) developed BCR in the RRP-, cRARP-, and rsRARP-group, respectively. Conclusions: Over the years, sRP has shifted from open to laparoscopic/robotic surgery. RARP shows good oncological and functional outcome. rsRARP ensures direct vision on the rectum during preparation and can therefore increase safety and surgeon’s confidence, especially in the salvage setting.
DOI:doi:10.3390/jcm11010202
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010202
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/1/202
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010202
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:open radical prostatectomy
 Retzius-sparing
 robotic radical prostatectomy
 salvage prostatectomy
K10plus-PPN:1790088577
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68880437   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang