Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Böcker, Arne Hendrik [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bank, Corinna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kim, Bong-Sung [VerfasserIn]   i
 Aman, Martin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pears, Kim Hannah [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klasen, Martin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Lambert, Sophie [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sopka, Saša [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Video-assisted peer teaching for surgical skills training - innovative potential for the medical curriculum and beyond
Titelzusatz:a randomized controlled trial
Verf.angabe:Arne Hendrik Boecker, MD, Corinna Bank, MD, Bong-Sung Kim, MD, Martin Aman, MD, Kim Hannah Pears, MA, Martin Klasen, Dr. rer. medic., Sophie Lambert, MSc, and SašaSopka MD, MME
Jahr:2022
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Available online 1 December 2021 ; Gesehen am 04.04.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of surgical education
Ort Quelle:New York, NY : Elsevier, 2007
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:79(2022), 2, Seite 441-451
ISSN Quelle:1878-7452
Abstract:Objective - Hygienic healthcare standards are essential for avoiding hospital infections. However, medical students and staff lack training in this field, which may be due to high personnel resources of present educational approaches. Thus, there is an urgent need for a novel and efficient approach. Aim of the study is to compare a newly developed video-assisted peer feedback (VAPF) method for teaching wound dressings to the traditional teaching method with qualified instructor feedback (QIF) with respect to essential learning outcomes. - Design, Setting and Participants - In this randomized controlled noninferiority trial, 251 medical undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of two interventions (QIF n=127; VAPF n=124). In QIF, participants received feedback from a qualified instructor. In VAPF, participants video-recorded each other while performing a wound dressing and gave each other feedback assisted by a standardized checklist. Outcome measures were participants’ score in an objective structured practical examination (OSPE) and a written exam after the course. - Results - Noninferiority of VAPF (n=123) compared to QIF (n=127) was confirmed for both OSPE (QIF: 8.83 ± 1.30; VAPF: 8.88 ± 1.04; mean difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.25) and written exam (QIF: 8.99 ± 1.06; VAPF: 9.14 ± 1.05; mean difference -0.15, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.12). - Conclusions - VAPF is a cost-efficient and viable alternative to QIF commonly used in medical education. It provides comparable training outcomes to the traditional training method with lower personnel investment. VAPF is a promising educational method for improving essential clinical competencies.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.008
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.008
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720421003081
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.008
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Cost-efficient
 Faculty resource
 Nosocomial infection
 Peer-teaching
 Surgical education
 Wound dressing
K10plus-PPN:1797417568
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68902910   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang