Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Görtz, Magdalena [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pursche, Lars [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schütz, Viktoria [VerfasserIn]   i
 Reimold, Philipp [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schwab, Constantin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stenzinger, Albrecht [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sültmann, Holger [VerfasserIn]   i
 Duensing, Stefan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bonekamp, David [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hohenfellner, Markus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Radtke, Jan Philipp [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Impact of surgeon’s experience in rigid versus elastic MRI/TRUS-fusion biopsy to detect significant prostate cancer using targeted and systematic cores
Verf.angabe:Magdalena Görtz, Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix, Lars Pursche, Viktoria Schütz, Philipp Reimold, Constantin Schwab, Albrecht Stenzinger, Holger Sültmann, Stefan Duensing, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Markus Hohenfellner and Jan Philipp Radtke
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:10 February 2022
Umfang:12 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 25.04.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Cancers
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2009
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:14(2022), 4, Artikel-ID 886, Seite 1-12
ISSN Quelle:2072-6694
Abstract:Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy (FB) have excellent sensitivity in detecting significant prostate cancer (sPC). FB platforms can be distinguished by rigid (RTB) or elastic image registration (ETB). We compared RTB and ETB by analyzing sPC detection rates of both RTB and ETB at different stages of the surgeons’ learning curve. Patients undergoing RTB between 2015-2017 (n = 502) were compared to patients undergoing ETB from 2017-2019 (n = 437). SPC detection rates were compared by Chi-square-test on patient-basis. Combination of transperineal systematic biopsy and each TB served as reference and sub-analyses were performed for different grades of surgeon’s experience. In the RTB subgroup, 233 men (46%) had sPC, compared to 201 (46%) in the ETB subgroup. RTB alone detected 94% of men with sPC and ETB 87% (p = 0.02). However, for at least intermediate-experienced surgeons (>100 FB), no differences occurred between RTB and ETB. In the total cohort, at least intermediate-experienced surgeons detected significantly more sPC (10%, p = 0.008) than novices. Thus, targeted transperineal MRI/TRUS-FB with a RTB registration system showed a similar sPC detection rate to ETB in experienced surgeons but a superior sPC detection rate to ETB in the total cohort. Low-experienced surgeons seem to benefit from RTB.
DOI:doi:10.3390/cancers14040886
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040886
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/4/886
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040886
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:elastic biopsy
 fusion-targeted prostate biopsy
 learning curve
 magnetic resonance imaging
 prostate cancer
 rigid biopsy
K10plus-PPN:1800218095
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68910535   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang