Status: Bibliographieeintrag
Standort: ---
Exemplare:
---
| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Eckert, Johannes A. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Bitsch, Rudi G. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Sonntag, Robert [VerfasserIn]  |
| Reiner, Tobias [VerfasserIn]  |
| Schwarze, Martin [VerfasserIn]  |
| Jäger, Sebastian [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | The primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions |
Verf.angabe: | J.A. Eckert, R.G. Bitsch, R. Sonntag, T. Reiner, M. Schwarze, S. Jaeger |
E-Jahr: | 2022 |
Jahr: | 7 Feb 2022 |
Umfang: | 9 S. |
Fussnoten: | Gesehen am 03.05.2022 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: Bone & joint research |
Ort Quelle: | London : British Editorial Soc. of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2012 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2022 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 11(2022), 2, Seite 82-90 |
ISSN Quelle: | 2046-3758 |
Abstract: | Aims - - The cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) features two variants: single and twin peg OUKA. The purpose of this study was to assess the stability of both variants in a worst-case scenario of bone defects and suboptimal cementation. - - Methods - - Single and twin pegs were implanted randomly allocated in 12 pairs of human fresh-frozen femora. We generated 5° bone defects at the posterior condyle. Relative movement was simulated using a servohydraulic pulser, and analyzed at 70°/115° knee flexion. Relative movement was surveyed at seven points of measurement on implant and bone, using an optic system. - - Results - - At the main fixation zone, the twin peg shows less relative movement at 70°/115°. At the transition zone, relative movements are smaller for the single peg for both angles. The single peg shows higher compression at 70° flexion, whereas the twin peg design shows higher compression at 115°. X-displacement is significantly higher for the single peg at 115°. - - Conclusion - - Bony defects should be avoided in OUKA. The twin peg shows high resilience against push-out force and should be preferred over the single peg. - - Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(2):82-90. |
DOI: | doi:10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2 |
| Volltext: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/full/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.112.BJR-2020-0507.R2 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Sach-SW: | bone defects |
| femora |
| femoral component |
| flexion |
| hip |
| knee flexion |
| knees |
| Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
| posterior condyle |
| Single peg |
| standard deviation |
| Twin peg |
K10plus-PPN: | 1800766130 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
¬The¬ primary stability of the femoral component in cemented single and twin peg Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under adverse conditions / Eckert, Johannes A. [VerfasserIn]; 7 Feb 2022 (Online-Ressource)
68913929