Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Vedder, Katharina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ebert, Anne [VerfasserIn]   i
 Szabo, Kristina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Förster, Alex [VerfasserIn]   i
 Alonso, Angelika [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Unknown onset stroke
Titelzusatz:differences between patients with wake-up stroke and daytime-unwitnessed stroke
Verf.angabe:Katharina Vedder, Dr. Anne Ebert, Prof. Dr. Kristina Szabo, Prof. Dr. Alex Förster, and Prof. Dr. Angelika Alonso
E-Jahr:2021
Jahr:July 2021
Umfang:6 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 23.05.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases
Ort Quelle:New York, NY : Elsevier, 1991
Jahr Quelle:2021
Band/Heft Quelle:30(2021), 7 vom: Juli, Artikel-ID 105842, Seite 1-6
ISSN Quelle:1532-8511
Abstract:Objectives - Patients with unknown onset stroke (UOS) can be categorized as wake-up stroke (WUS) and daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS). We sought to determine whether decisions for initial imaging modalities, frequency of mismatch findings, resulting treatment decisions and outcome differ between WUS and DUS patients. - Materials and Methods - In a retrospective analysis, all patients with UOS admitted to our Stroke Unit from January to December 2018 were evaluated and classified as either WUS or DUS. - Results - 180 patients were included (74.4 % WUS, 25.6 % DUS). Compared to WUS patients, DUS patients received more often a non-contrast computed tomography initially (43.5 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.016). MR imaging was performed more frequently in WUS patients (53.7 % vs. 34.8 %, p = 0.027). The rate of mismatch findings in patients examined with either multimodal CT or MRI (126 patients, 101 WUS and 26 DUS) did not differ between the groups. Likewise, the rate of intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy was similar in both groups. DUS patients had more often severe neurological deficits at admission as defined by the National Institutes of Stroke Scale score (14.2 vs. 8.6, p < 0.001). - Conclusions - Patients with DUS had disadvantages in mismatch-based treatment options due to initial imaging modalities. Current data do not support different treatment concepts in WUS and DUS patients. All UOS patients should initially be evaluated by either multimodal CT or MRI to open a chance to receive reperfusion therapy.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105842
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105842
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305721002457
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105842
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Daytime-unwitnessed stroke
 Mismatch, Thrombolysis
 Unknown onset stroke
 Wake-up stroke
K10plus-PPN:1804096741
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68921269   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang