Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Dong, Jing [VerfasserIn]   i
 Yao, Jinhan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Chang, Shuimiao [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kanclerz, Piotr [VerfasserIn]   i
 Khoramnia, Ramin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wang, Xiaogang [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Comparison study of the two biometers based on swept-source optical coherence tomography technology
Verf.angabe:Jing Dong, Jinhan Yao, Shuimiao Chang, Piotr Kanclerz, Ramin Khoramnia and Xiaogang Wang
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:26 February 2022
Umfang:10 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 04.06.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Diagnostics
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:12(2022), 3 vom: März, Artikel-ID 598, Seite 1-10
ISSN Quelle:2075-4418
Abstract:This research aimed to investigate the potential differences in the parameters, including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism, white-to-white (WTW) distance, acquired rate, and intraocular lens (IOL) power, between the two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, the ANTERION (biometer A) and IOLMaster 700 (biometer B). In a prospective observational comparative case series study, we enrolled 198 eyes undergoing cataract surgery. The AL, CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, astigmatism, WTW, acquired rate, and IOL power were assessed. McNemar tests compared the acquired rate, and the paired sample t-test compared the quantitative measurement results between the groups. Nineteen eyes were excluded owing to missing AL data for either biometer. Finally, data from 179 eyes were analyzed. Between the two devices, no significant difference was found in AL, astigmatism magnitude, J0, and J45, while significant differences existed in CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power; no statistical significance was found in the AL acquired rate (biometer A, 90.9% and biometer B, 93.9%). Approximately 65.4% of eyes demonstrated ≥0.5-D difference in IOL power between the two biometers. In conclusion, the two biometers showed significant differences in all measurements (CCT, ACD, LT, K, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power), except for AL.
DOI:doi:10.3390/diagnostics12030598
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030598
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/3/598
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030598
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:acquired rate
 anterior chamber depth
 astigmatism
 axial length
 swept-source optical coherence tomography
K10plus-PPN:180607611X
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68927367   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang