Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Murtha-Lemekhova, Anastasia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Fuchs, Juri [VerfasserIn]   i
 Teroerde, Miriam [VerfasserIn]   i
 Chiriac, Ute [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klotz, Rosa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hornuß, Daniel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Larmann, Jan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weigand, Markus A. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hoffmann, Katrin [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Routine postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis offers no benefit after hepatectomy
Titelzusatz:a systematic review and meta-analysis
Verf.angabe:Anastasia Murtha-Lemekhova, Juri Fuchs, Miriam Teroerde, Ute Chiriac, Rosa Klotz, Daniel Hornuss, Jan Larmann, Markus A. Weigand and Katrin Hoffmann
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:12 May 2022
Umfang:15 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 10.06.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Antibiotics
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:11(2022), 5, Artikel-ID 649, Seite 1-15
ISSN Quelle:2079-6382
Abstract:Background: Prophylactic antibiotics are frequently administered after major abdominal surgery including hepatectomies aiming to prevent infective complications. Yet, excessive use of antibiotics increases resistance in bacteria. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics after hepatectomy (postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, POA). Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis were completed according to the current PRISMA guidelines. The protocol has been registered prior to data extraction (PROSPERO registration Nr: CRD42021288510). MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched for clinical reports on POA in hepatectomy restrictions. A random-effects model was used for synthesis. Methodological quality was assessed with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. GRADE was used for the quality of evidence assessment. Results: Nine comparative studies comprising 2987 patients were identified: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospectives. POA did not lead to a reduction in postoperative infective complications or have an effect on liver-specific complications—post-hepatectomy liver failure and biliary leaks. POA over four or more days was associated with increased rates of deep surgical site infections compared to short-term administration for up to two days (OR 1.54; 95% CI [1.17;2.03]; p = 0.03). Routine POA led to significantly higher MRSA incidence as a pathogen (p = 0.0073). Overall, the risk of bias in the studies was low and the quality of evidence moderate. Conclusion: Routine POA cannot be recommended after hepatectomy since it does not reduce postoperative infection or liver-specific complications but contributes to resistance in bacteria. Studies into individualized risk-adapted antibiotic prophylaxis strategies are needed to further optimize perioperative treatment in liver surgery.
DOI:doi:10.3390/antibiotics11050649
URL:kostenfrei: Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050649
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/11/5/649
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050649
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:antibiotic resistance
 antibiotic stewardship
 antibiotics
 hepatectomy
 infection
 liver surgery
 meta-analysis
 surgical site infection
K10plus-PPN:1806759950
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68929657   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang