Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Krüger, Lisa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Tanuri, Amilcar [VerfasserIn]   i
 Lindner, Andreas K. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gaeddert, Mary [VerfasserIn]   i
 Köppel, Lisa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Tobian, Frank [VerfasserIn]   i
 Brümmer, Lukas E. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klein, Julian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Lainati, Federica [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schnitzler, Paul [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nikolai, Olga [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mockenhaupt, Frank P. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Seybold, Joachim [VerfasserIn]   i
 Corman, Victor M. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Jones, Terence C. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Drosten, Christian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gottschalk, Claudius [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weber, Stefan F. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weber, Stephan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ferreira, Orlando C. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mariani, Diana [VerfasserIn]   i
 dos Santos Nascimento, Erika Ramos [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pereira Pinto Castineiras, Terezinha M. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Galliez, Rafael Mello [VerfasserIn]   i
 Faffe, Debora Souza [VerfasserIn]   i
 Leitão, Isabela de Carvalho [VerfasserIn]   i
 dos Santos Rodrigues, Claudia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Frauches, Thiago Silva [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nocchi, Keity J. Chagas Vilela [VerfasserIn]   i
 Feitosa, Natalia Martins [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ribeiro, Sabrina Santana [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pollock, Nira R. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Knorr, Britta [VerfasserIn]   i
 Welker, Andreas [VerfasserIn]   i
 de Vos, Margaretha [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sacks, JilianA. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ongarello, Stefano [VerfasserIn]   i
 Denkinger, Claudia M. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests
Titelzusatz:a multi-centre clinical evaluation
Verf.angabe:Lisa J. Krüger, Amilcar Tanuri, Andreas K. Lindner, Mary Gaeddert, Lisa Köppel, Frank Tobian, Lukas E. Brümmer, Julian A.F. Klein, Federica Lainati, Paul Schnitzler, Olga Nikolai, Frank P. Mockenhaupt, Joachim Seybold, Victor M. Corman, Terence C. Jones, Christian Drosten, Claudius Gottschalk, Stefan F. Weber, Stephan Weber, Orlando C. Ferreira, Diana Mariani, Erika Ramos dos Santos Nascimento, Terezinha M. Pereira Pinto Castineiras, Rafael Mello Galliez, Debora Souza Faffe, Isabela de Carvalho Leitão, Claudia dos Santos Rodrigues, Thiago Silva Frauches, Keity J. Chagas Vilela Nocchi, Natalia Martins Feitosa, Sabrina Santana Ribeiro, Nira R. Pollock, Britta Knorr, Andreas Welker, Margaretha de Vos, JilianA. Sacks, Stefano Ongarello, and Claudia M. Denkinger, for the study team
Jahr:2022
Umfang:12 S.
Fussnoten:Published online 24 December 2021 ; Gesehen am 28.06.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: EBioMedicine
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2014
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:75(2022) vom: Jan., Artikel-ID 103774, Seite 1-12
ISSN Quelle:2352-3964
Abstract:Background - Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 are important diagnostic tools. We assessed clinical performance and ease-of-use of seven Ag-RDTs in a prospective, manufacturer-independent, multi-centre cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study to inform global decision makers. - Methods - Unvaccinated participants suspected of a first SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited at six sites (Germany, Brazil). Ag-RDTs were evaluated sequentially, with collection of paired swabs for routine reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and Ag-RDT testing. Performance was compared to RT-PCR overall and in sub-group analyses (viral load, symptoms, symptoms duration). To understandusability a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and ease-of-use (EoU) assessment were performed. - Findings - 7471 participants were included in the analysis. Sensitivities across Ag-RDTs ranged from 70·4%-90·1%, specificities were above 97·2% for all Ag-RDTs but one (93·1%).Ag-RDTs, Mologic, Bionote, Standard Q, showed diagnostic accuracy in line with WHO targets (> 80% sensitivity, > 97% specificity). All tests showed high sensitivity in the first three days after symptom onset (≥87·1%) and in individuals with viral loads≥ 6 log10SARS-CoV2 RNA copies/mL (≥ 88·7%). Usability varied, with Rapigen, Bionote and Standard Q reaching very good scores; 90, 88 and 84/100, respectively. - Interpretation - Variability in test performance is partially explained by variable viral loads in population evaluated over the course of the pandemic. All Ag-RDTs reach high sensitivity early in the disease and in individuals with high viral loads, supporting their role in identifying transmission relevant infections. For easy-to-use tests, performance shown will likely be maintained in routine implementation. - Funding - Ministry of Science, Research and Arts, State of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, internal funds from Heidelberg University Hospital, University Hospital Charité − Universitätsmedizin Berlin, UK Department of International Development, WHO, Unitaid.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396421005685
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests
 COVID-19
 SARS-CoV-2
 Sensitivity
 Specificity
K10plus-PPN:1808044290
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68935255   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang