Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Huber, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pahernik, Sascha [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hallscheidt, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sommer, Christof-Matthias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wagener, Nina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hatiboglu, Gencay [VerfasserIn]   i
 Haferkamp, Axel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hohenfellner, Markus [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Selective transarterial embolization for posttraumatic renal hemorrhage
Titelzusatz:a second try is worthwhile
Verf.angabe:Johannes Huber, Sascha Pahernik, Peter Hallscheidt, Christof M. Sommer, Nina Wagener, Gencay Hatiboglu, Axel Haferkamp and Markus Hohenfellner
E-Jahr:2011
Jahr:1 May 2011
Umfang:5 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 30.06.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: The journal of urology
Ort Quelle:New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1917
Jahr Quelle:2011
Band/Heft Quelle:185(2011), 5, Seite 1751-1755
ISSN Quelle:1527-3792
Abstract:Purpose: - - Selective percutaneous transarterial embolization has proved to be effective, safe treatment for posttraumatic renal hemorrhage but inefficacious procedures often lead to nephrectomy. Thus, the success rate of transarterial embolization should be maximized. - - Material and Methods: - - We retrospectively investigated the clinical success rate of transarterial embolization for posttraumatic bleeding. Study inclusion criteria were imaging evidence and clinical signs of hemorrhage or a hemoglobin decrease of more than 2 gm/dl in urological cases. We excluded spontaneous bleeding from analysis. - - Results: - - A total of 21 patients with a median age of 66 years (range 12 to 78) met study inclusion criteria. Etiology was blunt trauma in 3 cases (14%), stab wound in 1 (5%) and an iatrogenic cause in 17 (81%). In 2 patients an active bleeding site could not be detected during selective angiography. Transarterial embolization was done in 19 patients and led to primary clinical success in 12 (63%), including 2 with grade V parenchymal injury. In 6 of 7 cases (86%) in which primary treatment failed transarterial embolization was repeated. It resulted in clinical success in 4 of 6 patients (67%) with equal efficiency (p =1). Three patients (16%) who could not be sufficiently treated with transarterial embolization underwent nephrectomy. - - Conclusions: - - When conservative measures fail and clinical symptoms or a relevant hemoglobin decrease occur, transarterial embolization should be considered. Since the success rate is equally high for initial and repeat interventions, re-intervention is justified when the clinical course allows.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.045
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.045
 Volltext: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.045
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.045
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:embolization
 hemorrhage
 kidney
 reoperation
 therapeutic
 wounds and injuries
K10plus-PPN:1808702700
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68936288   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang