Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art

• Verfasst von: Plessner, Henning [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Betsch, Tilmann [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art
• Titelzusatz: response to Mascarenhas, Collins and Mortimer
• Verf.angabe: Henning Plessner and Tilmann Betsch
• Jahr: 2002
• Umfang: 4 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 21.07.2022
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of sport & exercise psychology
• Ort Quelle: Champaign, Ill. : Human Kinetics Publishers, 1979
• Jahr Quelle: 2002
• Band/Heft Quelle: 24(2002), 3, Seite 334-337
• ISSN Quelle: 1543-2904
• DOI: doi:10.1123/jsep.24.3.334
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Bibliogr. Hinweis: Erscheint auch als : Druck-Ausgabe: Plessner, Henning, 1965 - : Refereeing in sports is supposed to be a craft, not an art. - 2002
• Bibliogr. Hinweis: Ergänzung zu: Plessner, Henning, 1965 - : Sequential effects in important referee decisions
• Bibliogr. Hinweis: Ergänzung zu: Mascarenhas, Duncan: The art of reason versus the exactness of science in elite refereeing
• K10plus-PPN: 1811274137

Abstract

In their comments on a study on penalty decisions in soccer (Plessner & Betsch, 2001), Mascarenhas, Collins, and Mortimer (2002) point to several factors that, in their view, weaken the external validity of this laboratory study. In our response, we argue that although it may be helpful to substantiate the prior findings in a study closer to the natural setting of refereeing, Mascarenhas et al. provide no conclusive argument as to why the observed judgment biases should vanish under more realistic conditions.