Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Palmes, Daniel Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Brüwer, Matthias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bader, Franz G. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Betzler, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Becker, Heinz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bruch, Hans-Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Büchler, Markus W. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Buhr, Heinz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ghadimi, Beta Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hopt, Ulrich T. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Konopke, Ralf [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ott, Katja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Post, Stefan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ritz, Jörg-Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ronellenfitsch, Ulrich [VerfasserIn]   i
 Saeger, Hans-Detlev [VerfasserIn]   i
 Senninger, Norbert [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Diagnostic evaluation, surgical technique, and perioperative management after esophagectomy
Titelzusatz:consensus statement of the German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group
Verf.angabe:Daniel Palmes, Matthias Brüwer, Franz G. Bader, Michael Betzler, Heinz Becker, Hans-Peter Bruch, Markus Büchler, Heinz Buhr, Beta Michael Ghadimi, Ulrich T. Hopt, Ralf Konopke, Katja Ott, Stefan Post, Jörg-Peter Ritz, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Hans-Detlev Saeger, Norbert Senninger, German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group
E-Jahr:2011
Jahr:29 June 2011
Umfang:10 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 07.09.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Ort Quelle:Berlin : Springer, 1948
Jahr Quelle:2011
Band/Heft Quelle:396(2011), 6, Seite 857-866
ISSN Quelle:1435-2451
Abstract:PURPOSE: Correct diagnosis, surgical treatment, and perioperative management of patients with esophageal carcinoma remain crucial for prognosis within multimodal treatment procedures. This study aims to achieve a consensus regarding current management strategies in esophageal cancer by questioning a panel of experts from the German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study (GAST) group, comprised of 9 centers specialized in esophageal surgery, with a combined total of >220 esophagectomies per year. - MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Delphi method, a systematic and interactive, evidence-based approach, was used to obtain consensus statements from the GAST group regarding ambiguities and disparities in diagnosis, patient selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management of patients with esophageal carcinoma. After four rounds of surveys, agreement was measured by Likert scales and defined as full (100% agreement), near (≥66.6% agreement), or no consensus (<66.6% agreement). - RESULTS: Full or near consensus was obtained for essential aspects of esophageal cancer staging, proper surgical technique, perioperative management and indication for primary surgery, and neoadjuvant treatment or palliative treatment. No consensus was achieved regarding acceptability of minimally invasive technique and postoperative nutrition after esophagectomy. - CONCLUSION: The GAST consensus statement represents a position paper for treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma which both contributes to the development of clinical treatment guidelines and outlines topics in need of further clinical studies.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0818-3
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0818-3
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0818-3
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Consensus
 Delphi Technique
 Esophageal Neoplasms
 Esophagectomy
 Germany
 Humans
 Neoadjuvant Therapy
 Neoplasm Staging
 Palliative Care
 Patient Selection
 Perioperative Period
 Prognosis
K10plus-PPN:1815976497
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68961640   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang