Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Moessner, Markus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gallas, Christine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Haug, Severin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kordy, Hand [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:The clinical psychological diagnostic system (KPD-38)
Titelzusatz:sensitivity to change and validity of a self-report instrument for outcome monitoring and quality assurance
Verf.angabe:Markus Moessner, Christine Gallas, Severin Haug and Hand Kordy
Jahr:2011
Umfang:8 S.
Fussnoten:Published online 2 September 2010 ; Gesehen am 08.09.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Ort Quelle:New York, NY [u.a.] : Wiley, 1993
Jahr Quelle:2011
Band/Heft Quelle:18(2011), 4, Seite 331-338
ISSN Quelle:1099-0879
Abstract:Background: Monitoring psychotherapeutic progress requires valid and economic measures to detect change of clinical relevance. We addressed validity and sensitivity to change of the ‘Klinisch Psychologisches Diagnosesystem 38’ (KPD-38, Clinical Psychological Diagnosis System), an instrument for outcome monitoring and quality assurance. Methods: Data from an inpatient sample (n = 1.377) were used to investigate the concurrent validity, the sensitivity to change, and the criterion validity of the KPD-38 in comparison to the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). Results: Sensitivity-specificity analyses showed similar sensitivity and higher specificity for the KPD-38 scales compared with the BSI and OQ total scores. Change rates on the KPD-38 distress scale (DIS) were found to be lower than on the BSI (KPD-38 DIS: 36.6%, GSI: 67.7%) and the OQ-45 (KPD-38 DIS: 44.3%, OQ tot: 57.1%) total scores. Concordance was low with the BSI ([κ = 0.24] and moderate with the OQ-45 [κ = 0.45]). Discussion: Implications for applications in the field of outcome assessment and the challenge of further validation are discussed. The relation between sensitivity to change and criterion validity is highlighted. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Messages: • The KPD-38 is a self-report questionnaire for outcome monitoring and quality assurance, which is free of charge for research purposes. • Both OQ-45 and BSI show higher sensitivity to change than the KPD-38, overall concordance of change is moderate. • Aspects of validity should be considered in the evaluation of sensitivity to change.
DOI:doi:10.1002/cpp.717
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext ; Verlag: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.717
 Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cpp.717
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.717
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Concurrent Validity
 Criterion Validity
 KPD-38
 Outcome Monitoring
 Sensitivity to Change
K10plus-PPN:1816266914
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68961928   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang