Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Zachariah, Marianne [VerfasserIn]   i
 Phansalkar, Shobha [VerfasserIn]   i
 Seidling, Hanna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Neri, Pamela M [VerfasserIn]   i
 Cresswell, Kathrin M [VerfasserIn]   i
 Duke, Jon [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bloomrosen, Meryl [VerfasserIn]   i
 Volk, Lynn A [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bates, David W [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Development and preliminary evidence for the validity of an instrument assessing implementation of human-factors principles in medication-related decision-support systems - I-MeDeSA
Verf.angabe:Marianne Zachariah, Shobha Phansalkar, Hanna M Seidling, Pamela M Neri, Kathrin M Cresswell, Jon Duke, Meryl Bloomrosen, Lynn A Volk, David W Bates
E-Jahr:2011
Jahr:21 September 2011
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 19.12.2022
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: American Medical Informatics AssociationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Ort Quelle:Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1994
Jahr Quelle:2011
Band/Heft Quelle:18(2011), Suppl. 1, Seite i62-i72
ISSN Quelle:1527-974X
Abstract:Background Medication-related decision support can reduce the frequency of preventable adverse drug events. However, the design of current medication alerts often results in alert fatigue and high over-ride rates, thus reducing any potential benefits. Methods The authors previously reviewed human-factors principles for relevance to medication-related decision support alerts. In this study, instrument items were developed for assessing the appropriate implementation of these human-factors principles in drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts. User feedback regarding nine electronic medical records was considered during the development process. Content validity, construct validity through correlation analysis, and inter-rater reliability were assessed. Results The final version of the instrument included 26 items associated with nine human-factors principles. Content validation on three systems resulted in the addition of one principle ( Corrective Actions) to the instrument and the elimination of eight items. Additionally, the wording of eight items was altered. Correlation analysis suggests a direct relationship between system age and performance of DDI alerts (p=0.0016). Inter-rater reliability indicated substantial agreement between raters (κ=0.764). Conclusion The authors developed and gathered preliminary evidence for the validity of an instrument that measures the appropriate use of human-factors principles in the design and display of DDI alerts. Designers of DDI alerts may use the instrument to improve usability and increase user acceptance of medication alerts, and organizations selecting an electronic medical record may find the instrument helpful in meeting their clinicians' usability needs.
DOI:doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000362
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000362
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000362
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1827866608
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68999337   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang