Can a conditional financial incentive (CFI) reduce socio-demographic inequalities in home-based HIV testing uptake?

• Verfasst von: Inghels, Maxime [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kim, Hae-Young [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Mathenjwa, Thulile [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Shahmanesh, Maryam [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Seeley, Janet [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wyke, Sally [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: McGrath, Nuala [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Sartorius, Benn [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Yapa, H. Manisha [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Dobra, Adrian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bärnighausen, Till [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Tanser, Frank [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Can a conditional financial incentive (CFI) reduce socio-demographic inequalities in home-based HIV testing uptake?
• Titelzusatz: A secondary analysis of the HITS clinical trial intervention in rural South Africa
• Verf.angabe: Maxime Inghels, Hae-Young Kim, Thulile Mathenjwa, Maryam Shahmanesh, Janet Seeley, Sally Wyke, Nuala McGrath, Benn Sartorius, H. Manisha Yapa, Adrian Dobra, Till Bärnighausen, Frank Tanser
• E-Jahr: 2022
• Jahr: 1 September 2022
• Umfang: 10 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 10.01.2023
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Social science & medicine
• Ort Quelle: Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967
• Jahr Quelle: 2022
• Band/Heft Quelle: 311(2022) vom: Okt., Artikel-ID 115305, Seite 1-10
• ISSN Quelle: 1873-5347
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115305
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Financial incentives
• Sach-SW: HIV
• Sach-SW: Home-based HIV testing
• Sach-SW: Inequalities
• Sach-SW: South Africa
• K10plus-PPN: 183062024X

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, home-based HIV testing interventions are designed to reach sub-populations with low access to HIV testing such as men, younger or less educated people. Combining these interventions with conditional financial incentives (CFI) has been shown to be effective to increase testing uptake. CFI are effective for one-off health behaviour change but whether they operate differentially on different socio-demographic groups is less clear. Using data from the HITS trial in South Africa, we investigated whether a CFI was able to reduce existing home-based HIV testing uptake inequalities observed by socio-demographic groups. Residents aged ≥15 years in the study area were assigned to an intervention arm (16 clusters) or a control arm (29 clusters). In the intervention arm, individuals received a food voucher (∼3.5 US dollars) if they accepted to take a home-based HIV test. Testing uptake differences were considered for socio-demographic (sex, age, education, employment status, marital status, household asset index) and geographical (urban/rural living area, distance from clinic) characteristics. Among the 37,028 residents, 24,793 (9290 men, 15,503 women) were included in the analysis. CFI increased significantly testing uptake among men (39.2% vs 25.2%, p < 0.001) and women (45.9% vs 32.0%, p < 0.001) with similar absolute increase between men and women. Uptake was higher amongst the youngest or least educated individuals, and amongst single (vs in union) or unemployed men. Absolute uptake increase was also significantly higher amongst these groups resulting in increasing socio-demographic differentials for home-based HIV testing uptake. However, because these groups are known to have less access to other public HIV testing services, CFI could reduce inequalities for HIV testing access in our specific context. Although CFI significantly increased home-based HIV testing uptake, it did not do so differentially by socio-demographic group. Future interventions using CFI should make sure that the intervention alone does not increase existing health inequities.