Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Zidan, Mousa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schwindling, Franz Sebastian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Jürchott, Alexander [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mente, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nittka, Mathias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hosseini, Zahra [VerfasserIn]   i
 Heiland, Sabine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bendszus, Martin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hilgenfeld, Tim [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Reliability and accuracy of dental MRI for measuring root canal length of incisors and canines
Titelzusatz:a clinical pilot study
Verf.angabe:Mousa Zidan, Franz S. Schwindling, Alexander Juerchott, Johannes Mente, Mathias Nittka, Zahra Hosseini, Sabine Heiland, Martin Bendszus & Tim Hilgenfeld
E-Jahr:2022
Jahr:18 August 2022
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 03.03.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Scientific reports
Ort Quelle:[London] : Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:12(2022), Artikel-ID 14068, Seite 1-7
ISSN Quelle:2045-2322
Abstract:To evaluate whether high-resolution, non-contrast-enhanced dental MRI (dMRI) can reliably and accurately measure the canal length of incisors and canines compared with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Three-Tesla dMRI was performed in 31 participants (mean age: 50.1 +/- 14.2 years) with CBCT data. In total, 67 teeth were included (28 from the upper jaw and 39 from the lower jaw; 25 central incisors, 22 lateral incisors, and 20 canines). CBCT and dMRI datasets were reconstructed to visualize the root canal pathway in a single slice in the vestibulo-oral (V-O) and mesio-distal (M-D) direction. Root canal length was measured twice by two radiologists using dMRI and CBCT. Data were statistically analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and performing Bland-Altman analysis. The reliability of dMRI measurements was excellent and comparable to that of CBCT measurements (intra-rater I/intra-rater II/inter-rater was 0.990/0.965/0.951 for dMRI vs. 0.990/0.994/0.992 for CBCT in the M-D direction and 0.991/0.956/0.967 for dMRI vs. 0.998/0.994/0.996 for CBCT in the V-O direction). According to Bland-Altman analysis, the mean (95% confidence interval) underestimation of root canal lengths was 0.67 mm (- 1.22 to 2.57) for dMRI and 0.87 mm (- 0.29 to 2.04) for CBCT in the M-D direction/V-O direction. In 92.5% of cases, dMRI measurements of canal length had an accuracy within 0-2 mm. Visualization and measurement of canal length in vivo using dMRI is feasible. The reliability of dMRI measurements was high and comparable to that of CBCT measurements. However, the spatial and temporal resolution of dMRI is lower than that of CBCT, which means dMRI measurements are less accurate than CBCT measurements. This means dMRI is currently unsuitable for measuring canal length in clinical practice.
DOI:doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17889-3
URL:kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17889-3
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-17889-3
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17889-3
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:beam computed-tomography
 coil
 ct
 endodontics
 radiography
K10plus-PPN:1838104402
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69047467   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang