Clinical and functional results of cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow up of 5 years

• Verfasst von: Panzram, Benjamin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Barbian, Frederik [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Reiner, Tobias [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hariri, Mustafa [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Renkawitz, Tobias [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Walker, Tilman [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Clinical and functional results of cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow up of 5 years
• Titelzusatz: a consecutive cohort of 201 patients
• Verf.angabe: Benjamin Panzram, Frederik Barbian, Tobias Reiner, Mustafa Hariri, Tobias Renkawitz and Tilman Walker
• E-Jahr: 2023
• Jahr: 20 February 2023
• Umfang: 10 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 24.03.2023
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Ort Quelle: Basel : MDPI, 2012
• Jahr Quelle: 2023
• Band/Heft Quelle: 12(2023), 4, Artikel-ID 1694, Seite 1-10
• ISSN Quelle: 2077-0383
• DOI: doi:10.3390/jcm12041694
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
• Sach-SW: OUKR
• Sach-SW: Oxford knee
• Sach-SW: UKR
• K10plus-PPN: 1840023813

Abstract

The number of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) is increasing. Alongside various advantages, the revision rate of cemented UKR is higher compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKR). In contrast, cementless fixation shows reduced revision rates, compared to the cemented UKR. However, most of the recent literature is based on designer-dependent studies. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we investigated patients who underwent cementless Oxford UKR (OUKR) between 2012 and 2016 in our hospital with a minimum follow-up of five years. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the OKS, AKSS-O, AKSS-F, FFbH-OA, UCLA, SF-36, EQ-5D-3L, FJS, ROM, pain, and satisfaction measures. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation and revision as endpoints. We included 201 patients (216 knees) for clinical evaluation. All outcome parameters increased significantly from pre- to postoperative stages. The five-year survival rate was 96.1% for revision surgery and 94.9% for reoperation. The main reasons for revision were the progression of osteoarthritis, inlay dislocation, and tibial overstuffing. Two iatrogenic tibial fractures appeared. Cementless OUKR shows excellent clinical outcome and high survival rates after five years. The tibial plateau fracture in cementless UKR represents a serious complication and requires modification of the surgical technique.