Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Plath, Michaela [VerfasserIn]   i
 Marienfeld, Theresa [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sand, Matthias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weyer, Philipp Silvester van de [VerfasserIn]   i
 Praetorius, Mark [VerfasserIn]   i
 Plinkert, Peter K. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Baumann, Ingo [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zaoui, Karim [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation
Verf.angabe:Michaela Plath, Theresa Marienfeld, Matthias Sand, Philipp S. van de Weyer, Mark Praetorius, Peter K. Plinkert, Ingo Baumann & Karim Zaoui
Jahr:2022
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Online publiziert: 9. Februar 2021 ; Gesehen am 24.04.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology and head & neck
Ort Quelle:Berlin : Springer, 1864
Jahr Quelle:2022
Band/Heft Quelle:279(2022), 1, Seite 115-125
ISSN Quelle:1434-4726
Abstract:Purpose  Assessing cochlear implant (CI)-associated patient outcomes is a focus of implant research. Most studies have analyzed outcomes retrospectively with low patient numbers and few measurement time points. In addition, standardized CI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments have not been used. To address this, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in patients before and after implantation. - Methods  We assessed HRQoL using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Hearing Participation Scale (HPS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 100 deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (57 unilaterally deaf and 43 bilaterally deaf) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. We compared the results of unilaterally and bilaterally hearing-impaired patients and patients with or without a hearing aid. Principal component (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were also conducted. - Results  The NCIQ measured improvements in all 6 domains after CI and correlated well with other QoL instruments. The PCA revealed that the NCIQ can be better explained by physical, physical advanced, and socio-psychological components. The APHAB score ameliorated over time, except for the background noise domain. The overall HPS score improved over time, but the hearing handicap subscore significantly decreased. Sociodemographic influences on the questionnaire scores were relatively weak. - Conclusion  Assessing HRQoL is essential for quantifying the patient outcome after CI. NCIQ scores in our patient cohort showed improved HRQoL in all domains and we recommend that the NCIQ be used as a first-line questionnaire for assessing QoL in hearing-impaired patients after CI.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00405-021-06631-w
URL:kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06631-w
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-021-06631-w
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06631-w
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1843423774
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift
 
 
Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69068414   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang