| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Colleselli, Daniela [VerfasserIn]  |
| Pelzer, Alexandre E. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Steiner, E. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Ongarello, S. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Schaefer, G. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Bartsch, G. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Schwentner, C. [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range |
Verf.angabe: | D. Colleselli, A.E. Pelzer, E. Steiner, S. Ongarello, G. Schaefer, G. Bartsch and C. Schwentner |
Jahr: | 2010 |
Umfang: | 4 S. |
Fussnoten: | Online published: 22 December 2009 ; Gesehen am 10.05.2023 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases |
Ort Quelle: | Basingstoke : Stockton Press, 1997 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2010 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 13(2010), 2, Seite 182-185 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1476-5608 |
Abstract: | When offering watchful waiting or active monitoring protocols to prostate cancer (PCa) patients, differentiation between Gleason scores (GS) 6 and 7 at biopsy is important. However, upgrading after prostatectomy is common. We investigated the impact of different PSA levels on misclassification in the PSA range of 2-3.9 and 4-10 ng ml(-1). A total of 448 patients with GS 6 PCa on prostate biopsy were evaluated by comparing biopsy and prostatectomy GS. Possible over diagnosis was defined as GS <7, pathological stage pT2a and negative surgical margins, and possible under diagnosis was defined as pT3a or greater, or positive surgical margins; the percentage of over- or under diagnosis was determined for correctly and upgraded tumors after prostatectomy. A match between biopsy and prostatectomy GS was found in 210 patients (46.9%). Patients in the PSA range of 2.0-3.9 and 4.0-10.0 ng ml(-1) were upgraded in 32.6 and 44.0%, respectively. Over diagnosis was more common than under diagnosis (23.2% vs 15.6%). When upgraded there was a significant increase in under diagnosis. As almost 40% of GS 6 tumors on biopsy are GS 7 or higher after surgery with a significant rise in under diagnosis there is a risk of misclassification and subsequent delayed or even insufficient treatment, when relying on favorable biopsy GS. |
DOI: | doi:10.1038/pcan.2009.54 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.54 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2009.54 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Sach-SW: | Adult |
| Aged |
| Biopsy |
| Diagnostic Errors |
| Humans |
| Male |
| Middle Aged |
| Neoplasm Staging |
| Prostate-Specific Antigen |
| Prostatectomy |
| Prostatic Neoplasms |
K10plus-PPN: | 1845045971 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range / Colleselli, Daniela [VerfasserIn]; 2010 (Online-Ressource)