Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Łabuz, Grzegorz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Yan, Weijia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Baur, Isabella [VerfasserIn]   i
 Khoramnia, Ramin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Auffarth, Gerd U. [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Comparison of five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses
Titelzusatz:optical-bench assessment with visual-quality simulation
Verf.angabe:Grzegorz Łabuz, Weijia Yan, Isabella D. Baur, Ramin Khoramnia and Gerd U. Auffarth
E-Jahr:2023
Jahr:27 March 2023
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 16.05.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2023
Band/Heft Quelle:12(2023), 7 vom: März, Artikel-ID 2523, Seite 1-11
ISSN Quelle:2077-0383
Abstract:Presbyopia correction through implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) is a modality offered to both cataract and refractive-lens exchange patients. To maximize postoperative satisfaction, IOL selection needs to be made based on patients’ requirements aligned with the available technology. Five Trifocal IOLs were assessed in this study, and their differentiating features were identified: Triumf POD L GF, AT Lisa Tri, Tecnis Synergy, AcrySof IQ PanOptix, and Acriva Trinova Pro C. The optical quality was assessed using the modulation-transfer-function principle. Simulated defocus curves were derived from a non-linear formula. Far-focus simulated visual acuity (simVA) was 0.03 logMAR or better for all the studied IOLs, showing minimal differences. However, each IOL’s intermediate focus position differed across a range from 61 cm to 80 cm; and for the near focus, it was 36 cm to 44 cm. Triumf demonstrated improved intermediate point at the expense of the near focus resulting in a lower predicted near VA. PanOptix exhibited the shortest range of vision without a clear distinction between intermediate and near-point. The remaining lenses presented three foci of comparable optical quality and, thus, simVA performance. Each model, however, revealed a different aperture-change response. Trinova function improved at intermediate but was worse at near for larger pupils. The opposite was observed for AT Lisa. Synergy’s optical quality change was predominantly associated with lower pupil diameter. In conclusion, the trifocal IOLs can be differentiated according to their secondary-foci position, light-energy distribution, and pupil-size-related behavior. The observed differences may translate directly into a clinical effect showing that the trifocal IOLs vary in their ability to deliver optimal vision at different distances, with some providing improved intermediate while others favor reading distance. The knowledge gained through this objective testing can support IOL selection, postoperative patient counselling and increase the chance of spectacle independence after surgery.
DOI:doi:10.3390/jcm12072523
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072523
 Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/7/2523
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072523
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:modulation-transfer-function
 optical quality
 trifocal intraocular lens
K10plus-PPN:1845494911
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69076280   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang