"Climate change mitigation is a hot topic, but not when it comes to hospitals"

• Verfasst von: Quitmann, Claudia [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Sauerborn, Rainer [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Danquah, Ina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Herrmann, Alina [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: "Climate change mitigation is a hot topic, but not when it comes to hospitals"
• Titelzusatz: a qualitative study on hospital stakeholders’ perception and sense of responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions
• Verf.angabe: Claudia Quitmann, Rainer Sauerborn, Ina Danquah, Alina Herrmann
• Jahr: 2023
• Umfang: 7 S.
• Fussnoten: "Published online first 22 April 2022" ; Gesehen am 12.06.2023
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of medical ethics
• Ort Quelle: London : BMJ Publ., 1975
• Jahr Quelle: 2023
• Band/Heft Quelle: 49(2023), 3, Seite 204-210
• ISSN Quelle: 1473-4257
• DOI: doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107971
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Environment
• Sach-SW: Ethics- Medical
• K10plus-PPN: 1848790902
• K10plus-PPN:
  Universitätsbibliothek
• Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Abstract

Objective Physical and mental well-being are threatened by climate change. Since hospitals in high-income countries contribute significantly to climate change through their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the medical ethics imperative of ‘do no harm’ imposes a responsibility on hospitals to decarbonise. We investigated hospital stakeholders’ perceptions of hospitals’ GHG emissions sources and the sense of responsibility for reducing GHG emissions in a hospital. - Methods We conducted 29 semistructured qualitative expert interviews at one of Germany’s largest hospitals, Heidelberg University Hospital. Five patients, 12 clinical and 12 administrative employees on different levels were selected using purposive maximum variation sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework approach. - Results Concerning GHG emissions, hospital stakeholders perceived energy and waste as most relevant emission sources followed by mobility. Climate change mitigation in general was considered as important. However, in their role as patients or employees, hospital stakeholders felt less responsible for climate change mitigation. They saw providing best possible medical care to be the top priority in hospitals and were often concerned that patients’ health could be jeopardised by climate change mitigation measures. - Conclusion Perceptions of most important emission sources did not coincide with those in literature, highlighting the need to inform stakeholders, for instance, about pharmaceuticals as important emission source. A frequently perceived conflict between reducing emissions and providing high-quality medical care could be eased, if reducing emissions would not only be justified as a contribution to mitigation, but also as a contribution to preventing ill health—a basic principle of medical ethics.