The arthroscopic Bankart operation

• Verfasst von: Zink, Stefan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pfeiffenberger, T. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Müller, A. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Krisam, Regina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Unglaub, Frank [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pötzl, Wolfgang [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: The arthroscopic Bankart operation
• Titelzusatz: a 10-year follow-up study : arthroscopy and sports medicine
• Verf.angabe: S. Zink, T. Pfeiffenberger, A. Müller, R. Krisam, F. Unglaub, W. Pötzl
• E-Jahr: 2022
• Jahr: 9 January 2022
• Umfang: 11 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 31.07.2023
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
• Ort Quelle: Berlin : Springer, 1903
• Jahr Quelle: 2022
• Band/Heft Quelle: 142(2022), 11 vom: Nov., Seite 3367-3377
• ISSN Quelle: 1434-3916
• DOI: doi:10.1007/s00402-021-04282-4
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: General sports trauma
• Sach-SW: Glenoid labrum
• Sach-SW: Shoulder
• Sach-SW: Shoulder instability
• K10plus-PPN: 1853948713

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic shoulder instability most frequently occurs in young people often during sports events. Currently, the arthroscopic Bankart repair is the therapy of choice in the absence of extensive glenoid bone loss and has proved to be a safe and effective procedure. Nevertheless, we see recurrence of instability—especially if new trauma happens—and further data are needed to guide the right decision-making for these often young patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome 10 years after arthroscopic Bankart operation in terms of satisfaction of the patient, functional result, complications, recurrent instability, and development of osteoarthritis, and to look after possible risk factors for recurrence of instability and statistical proof of these. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine out of 49 patients underwent physical examination of both shoulders. We could perform a postoperative shoulder a-p X-ray in 28 patients. According to Samilson, [24] the extent of osteoarthritis was measured. The Constant score and the postoperative ROWE score were determined for both shoulders as well as the WOSI Score. In 25 cases, we calculated the ISIS Score. Results: We could reach out to 89.6% of patients and 79.6% could be physically examined. The vast majority of 95.5% are either very satisfied or satisfied with the result at the time we ended the follow-up. The mean Constant score of 95.5 reflects this result. In contrast to this, we found at the same time in 15.3% ongoing clinical signs of instability of the concerning shoulder, even though 9.1% had to be re-operated for recurrent instability in between the follow-up timeline and we found in the X-rays (57.1% of all patients) in 35.7% at least moderate and in 10.7% severe signs of osteoarthritis. The Constant score but not the ROWE score differed significantly in patients with no or mild compared to those with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis. Conclusions: The arthroscopic Bankart stabilization procedure showed after 10 years to be a very safe operation and to be able to produce a satisfying and functional very good long-term result—reflected by the Constant score. We assume that the extent of osteoarthritis seems to be the determining factor of the very good functional result, even though ongoing instability was present in 15.3% of the patients.