Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schäfer, Ramon [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hernández, Diego [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bärnighausen, Till [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schlander, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Health technology assessment-informed decision making by the federal joint Committee/Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in Germany and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England
Titelzusatz:the role of budget impact
Verf.angabe:Ramon Schaefer, Diego Hernández, Till Bärnighausen, Peter Kolominsky-Rabas, Michael Schlander
E-Jahr:2023
Jahr:July 2023
Umfang:13 S.
Illustrationen:Illustrationen
Fussnoten:Online verfügbar: 13. März 2023, Artikelversion: 27. Juni 2023 ; Gesehen am 22.08.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Value in health
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1998
Jahr Quelle:2023
Band/Heft Quelle:26(2023), 7 vom: Juli, Seite 1032-1044
ISSN Quelle:1524-4733
Abstract:Objectives - This study aimed to test (official) evaluation criteria including the potential role of budget impact (BI) on health technology assessment (HTA) outcomes published by the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss [GBA]) and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen [IQWiG]) in Germany as well as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England. - Methods - Data were extracted from all publicly available GBA decisions and IQWiG assessments as well as NICE single technology appraisals between January 2011 and June 2018, and information with regard to evaluation criteria used by these agencies was collected. Data were analyzed using logistic regression to estimate the effect of the BI on the HTA outcomes while controlling for criteria used by GBA/IQWiG and NICE. - Results - NICE recommendations are largely driven by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and, if applicable, by end-of-life criteria (P < .01). While IQWiG assessments are significantly affected by the availability of randomized controlled trials and patient-relevant endpoints (P < .01), GBA appraisals primarily focus on endpoints (P < .01). The BI correlated with NICE single technology appraisals (inverted-U relationship, P < .1) and IQWiG recommendations (increasing linear relationship, P < .05), but not with GBA decisions (P > .1). Nevertheless, given that IQWiG assessments seem to be more rigorous than GBA appraisals regarding the consideration of evidence-based evaluation criteria, decisions by GBA might be negatively associated with the BI. - Conclusions - Results reveal that GBA/IQWiG and NICE follow their official evaluation criteria consistently. After controlling for all significant variables, the BI seems to have an (independent) effect on HTA outcomes as well.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.018
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.018
 Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301523000992
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.018
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:budget impact
 evaluation criteria
 Federal Joint Committee
 health technology assessment
 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
K10plus-PPN:1857225821
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69115027   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang