Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Wörner, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Voelkl, Korbinian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bliemel, Christopher [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ferner, Felix [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weber, Markus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Renkawitz, Tobias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Grifka, Joachim [VerfasserIn]   i
 Craiovan, Benjamin [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head
Titelzusatz:core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
Verf.angabe:Michael Woerner, Korbinian Voelkl, Christopher Bliemel, Felix Ferner, Markus Weber, Tobias Renkawitz, Joachim Grifka and Benjamin Craiovan
E-Jahr:2023
Jahr:August 2023
Umfang:13 S.
Fussnoten:Zuerst online veröffentlicht: 10. August 2023 ; Gesehen am 02.10.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: The journal of international medical research
Ort Quelle:London : Sage, 1972
Jahr Quelle:2023
Band/Heft Quelle:51(2023), 8 vom: Aug., Seite 1-13
ISSN Quelle:1473-2300
Abstract:Objective - Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiveness of CD and CD + CBG in patients with ARCO stage II FHN in terms of postoperative pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EuroQol 5D, and Short Form 36 Questionnaire), and disease progression. - Methods - We retrospectively compared 11 patients treated with CD alone 48.0 months (range, 26.3-68.5 months) postoperatively versus 11 patients treated with CD + CBG 69.2 months (range, 38.0-92.9 months) postoperatively. All patients were assessed according to a routine clinical protocol involving a clinical examination, questionnaires, and radiological imaging (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). - Results - The clinical and radiological results showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both interventions demonstrated equal results according to clinical scores. - Conclusions - Our data may encourage application of the less invasive technique of CD alone without CBG, which is more surgically demanding. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the risk factors for therapy failure.
DOI:doi:10.1177/03000605231190453
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231190453
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605231190453
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1860610862
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69125918   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang