Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Riechmann, Merle [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schmidt, Christopher [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ahlers, M. Oliver [VerfasserIn]   i
 Feurer, Ima [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kleinheinz, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kolk, Andreas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pautke, Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schön, Andreas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Teschke, Marcus [VerfasserIn]   i
 Toferer, Astrid [VerfasserIn]   i
 Lux, Christopher J. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kirschneck, Christian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Krombach, Gabriele A. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ottl, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
 Vieth, Ulla [VerfasserIn]   i
 Stengel, Johanna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Völker, Caroline [VerfasserIn]   i
 Neff, Andreas [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Controversial aspects of diagnostics and therapy of idiopathic condylar resorption
Titelzusatz:an analysis of evidence- and consensus-based recommendations based on an interdisciplinary guideline project
Verf.angabe:Merle Riechmann, Christopher Schmidt, M. Oliver Ahlers, Ima Feurer, Johannes Kleinheinz, Andreas Kolk, Christoph Pautke, Andreas Schön, Marcus Teschke, Astrid Toferer, Christopher J. Lux, Christian Kirschneck, Gabriele A. Krombach, Peter Ottl, Ulla Vieth, Johanna Stengel, Caroline Völker and Andreas Neff
Jahr:2023
Umfang:20 S.
Illustrationen:Illustrationen
Fussnoten:Veröffentlicht: 27. Juli 2023 ; Gesehen am 10.10.2023
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2012
Jahr Quelle:2023
Band/Heft Quelle:12(2023), 15, Artikel-ID 4946, Seite 1-20
ISSN Quelle:2077-0383
Abstract:Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR), though a rare event, is associated with severe detrimental sequelae for the patient. To date, the etiology remains unknown, and treatment strategies are highly controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study is to present an analysis of the consensus- and evidence-based approach to ICR by a German interdisciplinary guideline project of the AWMF (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany). Following a systematic literature search, including 56 (out of an initial 97) publications, with a predominantly low level of evidence (LoE), two independent working groups (oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary, respectively) voted on a draft comprising 25 recommendations in a standardized anonymized and blinded Delphi procedure. While the results of the votes were relatively homogeneous, the interdisciplinary phase required a significantly higher number of rounds (p < 0.001). Most of the controversial recommendations were related to initial imaging (with consensus on CT/CBCT as the current diagnostic standard for imaging), pharmacotherapy (no recommendation due to lack of evidence), discopexy (no recommendation possible due to low LoE) and timing of orthognathic surgery (with consensus on two-staged procedures after invasive TMJ surgery, except for single-stage procedures if combined with total joint reconstruction). Overall, the Delphi procedure resulted in an interdisciplinary guideline offering the best possible evidence- and consensus-based expertise to date in the diagnosis and treatment of ICR.
DOI:doi:10.3390/jcm12154946
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154946
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/15/4946
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154946
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:condylar resorptions
 consensus
 Delphi method
 guideline
 idiopathic condylar resorption
 temporomandibular joint
K10plus-PPN:1861158009
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69128356   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang