Carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

• Verfasst von: Schupp, Tobias [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Behnes, Michael [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Abumayyaleh, Mohammad S. A. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Weidner, Kathrin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Rusnak, Jonas [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Mashayekhi, Kambis [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bertsch, Thomas [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Akın, Ibrahim [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias
• Verf.angabe: Tobias Schupp, Michael Behnes, Mohammad Abumayyaleh, Kathrin Weidner, Jonas Rusnak, Kambis Mashayekhi, Thomas Bertsch and Ibrahim Akin
• E-Jahr: 2022
• Jahr: 16 August 2022
• Umfang: 13 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 31.10.2023
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
• Ort Quelle: Basel : MDPI AG, 2014
• Jahr Quelle: 2022
• Band/Heft Quelle: 9(2022), 8, Artikel-ID 274, Seite 1-13
• ISSN Quelle: 2308-3425
• DOI: doi:10.3390/jcdd9080274
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: carvedilol
• Sach-SW: medical treatment
• Sach-SW: metoprolol
• Sach-SW: mortality
• Sach-SW: pharmacological drugs
• Sach-SW: ventricular fibrillation
• Sach-SW: ventricular tachycardia
• K10plus-PPN: 1868860361

Abstract

The study investigates the prognostic role of treatment with carvedilol as compared to metoprolol in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients on beta-blocker (BB) treatment with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Patients treated with carvedilol were compared to patients with metoprolol. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years. Secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and propensity score matching were applied for statistics. There were 1098 patients included, 80% treated with metoprolol and 20% with carvedilol. Patients with carvedilol were older, more often presenting with VT (78% vs. 62%; p = 0.001) and with more advanced stages of heart failure. Treatment with carvedilol was associated with comparable all-cause mortality compared to metoprolol (20% vs. 16%, log rank p = 0.234; HR = 1.229; 95% CI 0.874-1.728; p = 0.235). However, secondary endpoints (i.e., composite arrhythmic endpoint: 32% vs. 17%; p = 0.001 and cardiac rehospitalization: 25% vs. 14%; p = 0.001) were more frequently observed in patients with carvedilol, which was still evident after multivariable adjustment. After propensity score matching (n = 194 patients with carvedilol and metoprolol), no further differences regarding the distribution of baseline characteristics were observed. Within the propensity-score-matched cohort, higher rates of the composite arrhythmic endpoint were still observed in patients treated with carvedilol, whereas the risk of cardiac rehospitalization was not affected by the type of beta-blocker treatment. In conclusion, carvedilol and metoprolol are associated with comparable all-cause mortality in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, whereas the risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint was increased in patients with carvedilol therapy.