Assessing the extent of shared decision making in pediatrics

• Verfasst von: Herrle, Angélique [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hoffmann, Dorle U. [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Görig, Tatiana [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Georg, Sabine [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: König, Jochem [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Urschitz, Michael Siegfried [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bock, Freia de [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Eichinger, Michael [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Assessing the extent of shared decision making in pediatrics
• Titelzusatz: preliminary psychometric evaluation of the German CollaboRATEpediatric scales for patients aged 7-18 years, parents and parent-proxy reports
• Verf.angabe: Angélique Herrler, Dorle U. Hoffmann, Tatiana Görig, Sabine Georg, Jochem König, Michael S. Urschitz, Freia De Bock, Michael Eichinger
• E-Jahr: 2022
• Jahr: June 2022
• Umfang: 10 S.
• Fussnoten: Online verfügbar: 28 October 2021, Artikelversion: 24 May 2022 ; Im Titelzusatz ist "pediatric" bei "CollaboRATEpediatric" hochgestellt ; Gesehen am 16.01.2024
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Patient education and counseling
• Ort Quelle: Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1983
• Jahr Quelle: 2022
• Band/Heft Quelle: 105(2022), 6 vom: Juni, Seite 1642-1651
• ISSN Quelle: 1873-5134
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.029
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: CollaboRATE
• Sach-SW: Parents
• Sach-SW: Pediatric patients
• Sach-SW: Psychometric evaluation
• Sach-SW: Shared decision making
• K10plus-PPN: 1878184784

Abstract

Objective - To conduct a preliminary evaluation of psychometric properties of CollaboRATEpediatric, a set of three scales to assess shared decision making (SDM) with pediatric patients, parents and parents on behalf of their children (parent-proxy reports). As secondary objectives we examined the scales’ distributional characteristics, acceptability, and agreement between scales. - Methods - Patients aged ≥ 7 years and parents were recruited in two outpatient facilities providing healthcare services for children with neurological and behavioral health conditions. We collected 46, 169 and 227 pediatric patient, parent-proxy and parent reports, respectively. Convergent, divergent and discriminative validity were investigated. Acceptability of the scales and agreement between patient and parent-proxy reports were explored by assessing item nonresponse and Bland-Altman plots. - Results - While convergent and divergent validity were established for the parent scale, discriminative validity was not demonstrated for any of the scales. The scales showed good to excellent acceptability. Parent-proxy reports agreed to a moderate extent with patients’ self-reports of SDM. - Conclusion - CollaboRATEpediatric offers a starting point for parsimoniously assessing SDM in Pediatrics, however further psychometric testing is warranted. - Practice Implications - Given limited psychometric support for the pediatric patient scale, we recommend using both the pediatric patient and parent-proxy report scales to assess SDM in pediatric patients until further psychometric testing is concluded.