Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schmidt, Mona Wanda [VerfasserIn]   i
 Fan, Carolyn [VerfasserIn]   i
 Köppinger, Karl F. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schmidt, Leon P. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Brechter, Anna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Limen, Eldrige F. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Vey, Johannes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Metz, Matthes [VerfasserIn]   i
 Müller, Beat P. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nickel, Felix [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Laparoscopic but not open surgical skills can be transferred to robot-assisted surgery
Titelzusatz:a systematic review and meta-analysis: scientific review
Verf.angabe:Mona W Schmidt, Carolyn Fan, Karl F Köppinger, Leon P Schmidt, Anna Brechter, Eldrige F Limen, Johannes A Vey, Matthes Metz, Beat P Müller-Stich, Felix Nickel, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:January 2024
Umfang:15 S.
Fussnoten:Online veröffentlicht: 19. Dezember 2023 ; Gesehen am 14.02.2024
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: World journal of surgery
Ort Quelle:[Hoboken, New Jersey : Wiley, 1977
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:48(2024), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 14-28
ISSN Quelle:1432-2323
Abstract:Background With an increase in robot-assisted surgery across all specialties, adequate training and credentialing strategies need to be identified to ensure patients safety. The meta-analysis assesses the transferability of technical surgical skills between laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, and robot-assisted surgery. Design A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Outcomes were categorized into time, process, product, and composite outcome measures and pooled separately using Hedges'g (standardized mean difference [SMD]). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of study design, virtual reality platforms and task difficulty. Results Out of 14,120 screened studies, 30 were included in the qualitative synthesis and 26 in the quantitative synthesis. Technical surgical skill transfer was demonstrated from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery (composite: SMD 0.40, 95%-confidence interval [CI] [0.19; 0.62], time: SMD 0.62, CI [0.33; 0.91]) and vice versa (composite: SMD 0.66, CI [0.33; 0.99], time [basic skills]: SMD 0.36, CI [0.01; 0.72]). No skill transfer was seen from open to robot-assisted surgery with limited available data. Conclusion Technical surgical skills can be transferred from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery and vice versa. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgical skills training and credentialing should not be regarded separately, but a reasonable combination could shorten overall training times and increase efficiency. Previous experience in open surgery should not be considered as an imperative prerequisite for training in robot-assisted surgery. Recommendations for studies assessing skill transfer are proposed to increase comparability and significance of future studies. PROSPERO Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42018104507.
DOI:doi:10.1002/wjs.12008
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12008
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wjs.12008
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12008
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:laparoscopic surgery
 minimally invasive surgery
 open surgery
 robotic-assisted surgery
 skill
 transferability
K10plus-PPN:1880713969
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69182030   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang