In vitro pilot study comparing a novel implantoplasty sonic instrumentation protocol with a conventional protocol using burs

• Verfasst von: Tsampli, Anna [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Rues, Stefan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kappel, Hannes [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Rammelsberg, Peter [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kappel, Stefanie [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: In vitro pilot study comparing a novel implantoplasty sonic instrumentation protocol with a conventional protocol using burs
• Verf.angabe: Anna Tsampli, Stefan Rues, Hannes Kappel, Peter Rammelsberg, Stefanie Kappel
• E-Jahr: 2024
• Jahr: 15 January 2024
• Umfang: 10 S.
• Illustrationen: Illustrationen
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 22.02.2024
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Clinical oral implants research
• Ort Quelle: Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1990
• Jahr Quelle: 2024
• Band/Heft Quelle: (2024) online ahead of print
• ISSN Quelle: 1600-0501
• DOI: doi:10.1111/clr.14231
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: dental implants
• Sach-SW: implantoplasty
• Sach-SW: in vitro
• Sach-SW: peri-implantitis
• K10plus-PPN: 1881428222

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of implantoplasty (IP) is to remove titanium implant layers that have been contaminated and to smoothen the implant surfaces so they retain less plaque. However, existing IP methods are very invasive and reduce implant wall thickness. Aim: To investigate the suitability of novel sonic tips in IP and to compare this novel protocol with conventional abrasive procedures. Materials and Methods: Thirty dental implants (Ø 4.1 mm, 10 mm length) were distributed in three groups and investigated according to the protocol of Sivolella et al., with modifications to the instrument's feed rate, the applied contact force, and the speed of implant rotations per minute. The upper third of the implant was processed with a diamond-coated bur (BUR) or novel non-diamond-coated sonic tips (AIRSCALER). After standardized IP, the surfaces were analyzed by tactile profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Changes in implant weight, implant material loss, and implant fracture strength were assessed. Results: The mean roughness (Ra, Sa), implant material loss, and change in implant weight were significantly lower in the AIRSCALER group than in the BUR group, whereas the mean compression resistance values were significantly higher in the AIRSCALER group than in the BUR group. Conclusions: IP with uncoated sonic tips smoothes the surfaces and reduces structural loss of the implant in the area of microthreads. This new IP method could be of great clinical importance, especially for implants with microthreads and reduced diameter or wall thickness.