Militarisation of COVID-19 responses and autocratisation

• Verfasst von: Croissant, Aurel [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kühn, David [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Macias Herrera, Ariam [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Pion-Berlin, David [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Militarisation of COVID-19 responses and autocratisation
• Titelzusatz: a comparative study of eight countries in Asia-Pacific and Latin America
• Institutionen: German Institute for Global and Area Studies [Herausgebendes Organ]
• Verf.angabe: Aurel Croissant, David Kuehn, Ariam Macias-Weller, and David Pion-Berlin
• Verlagsort: Hamburg, Germany
• Verlag: German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA)
• E-Jahr: 2023
• Jahr: June 2023
• Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten)
• Illustrationen: Diagramme
• Gesamttitel/Reihe: GIGA working papers ; no 334
• Gesamttitel/Reihe: GIGA research programme: accountability and participation
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: COVID-19
• Sach-SW: civil-military relations
• Sach-SW: militarisation
• Sach-SW: democratic backsliding
• Sach-SW: disaster response
• Form-SW: Graue Literatur
• K10plus-PPN: 1847668240

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between the militarisation of COVID-19 state responses and autocratisation in eight Asian and Latin American countries. Using a conceptual framework of COVID-19-related military missions and operations, our findings for each country over the first two pandemic years show that although military engagements in the COVID-19 response profiles considerably varied, all governments deployed their military, especially in the provision of health services, logistics, and the production of COVID19 goods. Meanwhile, soldiers were generally less involved in health bureaucracy and public security. Based on two rounds of an expert survey, we then evaluated whether military pandemic deployments negatively affected democratic standards. This was the case where soldiers routinely conducted public-security operations autonomous of effective civilian oversight. Our study concludes that the pandemic did not induce autocratisation; rather, it exacerbated pre-existing conditions and problems in the democratic governance of the security sector. This "acceleration effect" was visible in democracies and autocracies experiencing autocratisation already prior to the pandemic.