| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Rabe, Leonie [VerfasserIn]  |
| Wenz, Frederik [VerfasserIn]  |
| Ehmann, Michael [VerfasserIn]  |
| Lohr, Frank [VerfasserIn]  |
| Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter [VerfasserIn]  |
| Bürgy, Daniel [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | Radiotherapy and newly approved cancer drugs |
Titelzusatz: | a quantitative analysis of registered protocols for drugs approved for the treatment of solid tumors |
Verf.angabe: | Leonie Rabe, Frederik Wenz, Michael Ehmann, Frank Lohr, Ralf Dieter Hofheinz, Daniel Buergy |
E-Jahr: | 2022 |
Jahr: | March 2022 |
Umfang: | 6 S. |
Fussnoten: | Online verfügbar: 29. Januar 2022, Artikelversion: 4. Februar 2022 ; Gesehen am 30.04.2024 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: Radiotherapy and oncology |
Ort Quelle: | Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1983 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2022 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 168(2022) vom: März, Seite 69-74 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1879-0887 |
Abstract: | Background/purpose - To evaluate the usage of RT in trial protocols for anti-cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). - Methods - Drugs which had been granted an FDA approval between 2010 and 2017 for the treatment of solid tumors in adults were identified. Use of RT in relation to each drug’s approval date was reviewed on ClinicalTrials.gov. - Results - Out of 42 drugs, none was initially approved for an indication which mandates RT. One drug (2.4%) has a post-approval label extension for sequential usage after RT. 5846 records were screened, exclusion of non-cancer trials and duplicates resulted in 4254 protocols out of which 2919 were industry-sponsored (68.6%). RT was tested in 350 (8.2%) studies. Out of 75 drug/RT trials which were initiated prior to approval, fourteen had not yet started recruitment, 45 were recruiting, one was completed, one prematurely terminated and fourteen fully-recruited but ongoing at approval time. Out of the fully-recruited or completed studies, results from four studies on three drugs were already published. In 52.4% of drugs, no patient had been treated with a drug/RT combination at the approval date. Drug/RT studies were less likely industry-sponsored (p < 0.001) and more likely initiated post-approval (p < 0.001) compared to drug-only trials. Despite this imbalance, pre-approval drug/RT trials were still mostly industry-sponsored (65.3%). - Conclusion - No drug/RT data were publicly available in over 90% of newly approved anti-cancer drugs. These results indicate that clinicians must rely on postmarketing surveillance to identify drug/RT interactions as data from trials are unavailable at approval. |
DOI: | doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.025 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.025 |
| Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814022000305 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.025 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Sach-SW: | Cancer trials |
| Clinical trials |
| ClinicalTrials registry |
| Radiotherapy |
K10plus-PPN: | 188740337X |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
Radiotherapy and newly approved cancer drugs / Rabe, Leonie [VerfasserIn]; March 2022 (Online-Ressource)