| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Grazia, Alice [VerfasserIn]  |
| Altomare, Daniele [VerfasserIn]  |
| Preis, Lukas [VerfasserIn]  |
| Monsch, Andreas U. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Cappa, Stefano F. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Gauthier, Serge [VerfasserIn]  |
| Frölich, Lutz [VerfasserIn]  |
| Winblad, Bengt [VerfasserIn]  |
| Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen A. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Teipel, Stefan J. [VerfasserIn]  |
| Boccardi, Marina [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | Feasibility of a standard cognitive assessment in European academic memory clinics |
Verf.angabe: | Alice Grazia, Daniele Altomare, Lukas Preis, Andreas U. Monsch, Stefano F. Cappa, Serge Gauthier, Lutz Frölich, Bengt Winblad, Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer, Stefan J. Teipel, Marina Boccardi, for the Consortium for the Harmonization of Neuropsychological Assessment |
E-Jahr: | 2023 |
Jahr: | June 2023 |
Umfang: | 11 S. |
Fussnoten: | Erstmals veröffentlicht: 01. Dezember 2022 ; Gesehen am 04.06.2024 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: Alzheimer's and dementia |
Ort Quelle: | Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2005 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2023 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 19(2023), 6 vom: Juni, Seite 2276-2286 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1552-5279 |
Abstract: | Abstract Introduction Standardized cognitive assessment would enhance diagnostic reliability across memory clinics. An expert consensus adapted the Uniform Dataset (UDS)-3 for European centers, the clinician's UDS (cUDS). This study assessed its implementation acceptability and feasibility. Methods We developed a survey investigating barriers, facilitators, and willingness to implement the cUDS. With a mixed-methods design, we analyzed data from academic memory clinics. Results Seventy-eight percent of responding clinicians were experienced neuropsychologists/psychologists and 22% were medical specialists coming from 18 European countries. Sixty-five percent clinicians were willing to implement cUDS. General barriers related to implementation (43%) and clinical-methodological domains (21%). Favorable clinicians reported finances (15%) and digitalization (9%) as facilitating, but unavailability of local norms (23%) as hindering. Unfavorable clinicians reported logistical (23%) and time issues (18%). Discussion Despite challenges, data showed moderate clinicians' acceptability and requirements to improve feasibility. Nonetheless, these results come from academic clinicians. The next steps will require feasibility evaluation in non-academic contexts. |
DOI: | doi:10.1002/alz.12830 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12830 |
| kostenfrei: Volltext: http://alz.journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.12830 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12830 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Bibliogr. Hinweis: | Errata: Grazia, Alice: Correction to “Feasibility of a standard cognitive assessment in European academic memory clinics” |
Sach-SW: | Alzheimer's disease |
| implementation feasibility |
| mild cognitive impairment |
| mixed-methods |
| standard cognitive assessment |
K10plus-PPN: | 1890556971 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
Feasibility of a standard cognitive assessment in European academic memory clinics / Grazia, Alice [VerfasserIn]; June 2023 (Online-Ressource)