Patient compliance in assessing electronic patient-reported outcome measures after urologic surgery

• Verfasst von: Grüne, Britta [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Menold, Hanna [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Lenhart, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Mühlbauer, Julia [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Walach, Margarete [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Waldbillig, Frank [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Neuberger, Manuel [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Nuhn, Philipp [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Michel, Maurice Stephan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Koenig, Julian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kriegmair, Maximilian [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wessels, Frederik [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Patient compliance in assessing electronic patient-reported outcome measures after urologic surgery
• Verf.angabe: Britta Grüne, Hanna Menold, Maximilian Lenhart, Julia Mühlbauer, Margarete T. Walach, Frank Waldbillig, Manuel Neuberger, Philipp Nuhn, Maurice S. Michel, Julian Koenig, Maximilian C. Kriegmair, Frederik Wessels
• E-Jahr: 2023
• Jahr: March 22 2023
• Umfang: 8 S.
• Fussnoten: Online veröffentlicht: 7. Januar 2022 ; Gesehen am 25.06.2024
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Urologia internationalis
• Ort Quelle: Basel : Karger, 1955
• Jahr Quelle: 2023
• Band/Heft Quelle: 107(2023), 3 vom: März, Seite 280-287
• ISSN Quelle: 1423-0399
• DOI: doi:10.1159/000520755
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1892132583

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess patient compliance with a newly established electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system after urologic surgery and to identify influencing factors. Methods: Digital surveys were provided to patients undergoing cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, or transurethral resection of bladder tumor via a newly established ePROM system. Participants received a baseline survey preoperatively and several follow-up surveys postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting compliance. Results: Of N = 435 eligible patients, n = 338 completed the baseline survey (78.0%). Patients who did not participate were significantly more likely male (p = 0.004) and older than 70 years (p = 0.005). Overall, 206/337 patients (61.3%) completed the survey at 1-month, 167/312 (53.5%) at 3-month, and 142/276 (51.4%) at 6-month follow-up. Lower baseline quality of life (odds ratio: 2.27; p = 0.004) was a significant predictor for dropout at 1-month follow-up. Low educational level was significantly associated with low compliance at 3- (OR: 1.92; p = 0.01) and 6-month follow-up (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Acceptable compliance rates can be achieved with ePROMs following urologic surgery. Several factors influence compliance and should be considered when setting-up ePROM surveys.