Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Kehl, Sven [VerfasserIn]   i
 Düster, Hanna [VerfasserIn]   i
 Weiß, Christel [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bader, Simon [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schneider, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Beckmann, Matthias W. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Dammer, Ulf [VerfasserIn]   i
 Pretscher, Jutta [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Trial of labor after caesarean section in low risk pregnancies
Titelzusatz:is it risky?
Verf.angabe:Sven Kehl, Hanna Düster, Christel Weiss, Simon Bader, Michael Schneider, Matthias W. Beckmann, Ulf Dammer, Jutta Pretscher
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:29 August 2024
Umfang:7 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 20.09.2024
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Ort Quelle:Berlin : Springer, 1870
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:(2024), Seite 1-7
ISSN Quelle:1432-0711
Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the influence of a previous caesarean section on adverse composite maternal and perinatal outcome in women who attempted a trial of labor. Methods: This historical cohort study analyzed maternal and perinatal outcome in women with otherwise low risk pregnancies at term who underwent a trial of labor after a caesarean section (TOLAC). The primary outcome measure was the adverse composite outcome. Secondary outcome measures were amongst others the caesarean section rate and the mode of vaginal delivery. Results: The adverse composite outcome was more frequently in the previous caesarean section group compared to women with no previous caesarean Sect. (22.3% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.0001). The percentage of caesarean Sect. (15.4% vs. 8.2%, p < 0,0001), uterine rupture (1.0% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.0001), placental abruption (1.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.0014), vaginal operative delivery (16.0% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.0001), pH < 7.10 (3.7% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.0151), base excess < -12 (3.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.0297), abnormal cardiotocography (22.5% vs. 13.9%, p < 0,0001) and fetal blood analysis (6.2% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in women with a previous caesarean section. Taking the parity into account, these differences could only been seen in women without a previous vaginal delivery. In parous women with a previous vaginal delivery and a caesarean section in history, the adverse composite did not differ between the groups. Only the rate of pH < 7.1 was higher in women after a caesarean Sect. (4.5% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0436). Conclusion: Trial of labor after caesarean in otherwise low risk pregnancies is associated with a higher rate of complications especially if there is no history of vaginal delivery.
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07700-1
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Caesarean section rate
 Composite adverse outcome
 Medical Ethics
 Prior caesarean section
 TOLAC
 Uterine rupture
 VBAC
K10plus-PPN:1903059879
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69254947   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang