Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Chaouch, Mohamed Ali [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mazzotta, Alessandro [VerfasserIn]   i
 da Costa, Adriano Carneiro [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hussain, Mohammad Iqbal [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gouader, Amine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Krimi, Bassem [VerfasserIn]   i
 Panaro, Fabrizio [VerfasserIn]   i
 Guiu, Boris [VerfasserIn]   i
 Soubrane, Olivier [VerfasserIn]   i
 Oweira, Hani [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization before hepatectomy
Titelzusatz:future liver volume, postoperative outcomes, and oncological safety
Verf.angabe:Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Alessandro Mazzotta, Adriano Carneiro da Costa, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Amine Gouader, Bassem Krimi, Fabrizio Panaro, Boris Guiu, Olivier Soubrane, Hani Oweira
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:10 January 2024
Umfang:11 S.
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 05.12.2024
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Frontiers in medicine
Ort Quelle:Lausanne : Frontiers Media, 2014
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:10(2024), Artikel-ID 1334661, Seite 1-11
ISSN Quelle:2296-858X
Abstract:Introduction: This systematic review aimed to compare liver venous deprivation (LVD) with portal vein embolization (PVE) in terms of future liver volume, postoperative outcomes, and oncological safety before major hepatectomy. Methods: We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. Comparative articles published before November 2022 were retained. Results: The literature search identified nine eligible comparative studies. They included 557 patients, 207 in the LVD group and 350 in the PVE group. This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that LVD was associated with higher future liver remnant (FLR) volume after embolization, percentage of FLR hypertrophy, lower failure of resection due to low FLR, faster kinetic growth, higher day 5 prothrombin time, and higher 3 years’ disease-free survival. This study did not find any difference between the LVD and PVE groups in terms of complications related to embolization, FLR percentage of hypertrophy after embolization, failure of resection, 3-month mortality, overall morbidity, major complications, operative time, blood loss, bile leak, ascites, post hepatectomy liver failure, day 5 bilirubin level, hospital stay, and three years’ overall survival. Conclusion: LVD is as feasible and safe as PVE with encouraging results making some selected patients more suitable for surgery, even with a small FLR. Systematic review registration: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO before conducting the study (CRD42021287628)
DOI:doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1334661
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1334661
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1334661/full
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1334661
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Hepatectomy
 Liver Failure
 Liver venous deprivation
 Portal embolization
 Remnant liver volume
 Surgery
K10plus-PPN:1910960306
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69280855   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang