Recent metaphors of Brexit in the British press

• Verfasst von: Landmann, Julia [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Ganz, Yannick [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Recent metaphors of Brexit in the British press
• Titelzusatz: a linguistic analysis based on the Financial Times
• Verf.angabe: Julia Landmann and Yannick Ganz
• E-Jahr: 2024
• Jahr: June 2024
• Umfang: 5 S.
• Fussnoten: Online publiziert: 19 September 2023 ; Gesehen am 20.01.2025
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: English today
• Ort Quelle: Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985
• Jahr Quelle: 2024
• Band/Heft Quelle: 40(2024), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 149-153
• ISSN Quelle: 1474-0567
• DOI: doi:10.1017/S0266078423000238
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1915124298
• K10plus-PPN:
  Universitätsbibliothek
• Lokale URL UB: Zum Volltext

Abstract

In the referendum of 23 June 2016, the UK's decision to leave the EU in the course of a Brexit was very close, with 51.9% (Leave) versus 48.1% (Remain). A year after the final withdrawal from the European Union, disillusionment seems to have spread in Great Britain. The focus of previous linguistic studies is mostly on the language used during the Leave and Remain campaigns. Charteris-Black (2019) is the first book-length study to provide a systematic description of the plethora of metaphors of Brexit. His analysis is based on the evaluation of a variety of data published in connection with the Brexit referendum, ranging from newspaper articles to social media posts and cartoons:[ . . . ] once we look under the surface we find that understanding the metaphors of the Brexit debate provides rich insight into the profoundly moral outlooks that influenced both those who sought to leave the European Union and those who wished to remain in it. Members of the public, opinion formers and politicians relied on metaphor as a way of framing political issues and creating persuasive stories and allegories. Understanding these better helps us to understand not only what divided the two sides but also what both sides held in common: a belief and desire that they could improve their country. (Charteris-Black, 2019: 2)