Responsibility for rationality

• Verfasst von: Schmidt, Sebastian [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Responsibility for rationality
• Titelzusatz: foundations of an ethics of mind
• Verf.angabe: Sebastian Schmidt
• Verlagsort: New York ; London
• Verlag: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
• Jahr: 2025
• Umfang: viii, 203 Seiten
• Gesamttitel/Reihe: Routledge studies in epistemology
• Fussnoten: Literaturverzeichnis Seite 189-200
• ISBN: 978-1-032-46717-7
• ISBN: 978-1-032-46718-4
• Schlagwörter: (s)Ethik / (s)Kritischer Rationalismus / (s)Mitverantwortung / (s)Philosophy of Mind / (s)Verantwortung / (s)Rationalismus / (s)Norm <Ethik> / (s)Moral
• Sprache: eng
• Bibliogr. Hinweis: Erscheint auch als : Online-Ausgabe: Schmidt, Sebastian, 1981-: Responsibility for rationality. - New York, NY : Routledge, 2025 |(DLC)2024031798
• K10plus-PPN: 1904034985

Abstract

"This book argues that we are directly responsible for our attitudes by considering how we blame each other for being irrational. It thereby connects the most recent research on responsibility and rationality in a unifying dialectic. How can we be responsible for our attitudes if we cannot normally choose what we believe, desire, feel, and intend? This problem has received much attention during the last decades, both in epistemology and ethics. Yet its connections to discussions about reasons and rationality have been largely overlooked. This book develops the foundations of an ethics of mind by investigating the responsibility that is presupposed by the requirements of rationality that govern our attitudes. It has five main goals. First, it reinterprets the problem of responsibility for attitudes as a problem about the normativity of rationality. Second, it connects substantive and structural rationality by drawing on debates about responsibility. Third, it supports recent accounts of the normativity of rationality by explicitly defending the view that epistemic reasons and other 'right-kind' reasons are genuine normative reasons. Fourth, it breaks the stalemate between rationalist and voluntarist accounts of mental responsibility by proposing a hybrid view. Finally, it argues that being irrational can warrant moral blame, thus revealing an unnoticed normative force of rational requirements. Responsibility for Rationality is an original and essential resource for scholars and advanced students interested in connecting strands of normative theory within epistemology, metaethics, and moral psychology"