Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Melzig, Claudius [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mayer, Victoria Louise [VerfasserIn]   i
 Moll, Martin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Naas, Omar [VerfasserIn]   i
 Hartmann, Sibylle [VerfasserIn]   i
 Do, Thuy [VerfasserIn]   i
 Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rengier, Fabian [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Impact of structured reporting of lower extremity CT angiography on report quality and workflow efficiency
Verf.angabe:Claudius Melzig, Victoria Mayer, Martin Moll, Omar Naas, Sibylle Hartmann, Thuy Duong Do, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and Fabian Rengier
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:6 September 2024
Umfang:14 S.
Illustrationen:Illustrationen
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 05.02.2025
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Diagnostics
Ort Quelle:Basel : MDPI, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:14(2024), 17, Artikel-ID 1968, Seite 1-14
ISSN Quelle:2075-4418
Abstract:We assessed the effects of structured reporting (SR) of lower extremity CT angiography (CTA) on report quality and workflow efficiency compared with conventional reports (CR). Surveys were conducted at an academic radiology department before and after the introduction of an SR template. Participants (n = 39, 21) rated report quality and report creation effort (1: very dissatisfied/low to 10: very satisfied/high) and whether SR represents an improvement over CR (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree). Four residents and two supervising radiologists created both CR and SR of 40 CTA examinations. Report creation time was measured and the factual accuracy of residents’ reports was judged. Report completeness (median 8.0 vs. 7.0, p = 0.016) and clinical usefulness (7.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.029) were rated higher for SR. Supervising radiologists found report clarity improved by SR (8.0 vs. 4.5, p = 0.029). Report creation effort was unchanged (7.0 vs. 6.0, p > 0.05). SR was considered an improvement over CR (median 4.0, IQR,3.0-5.0). Report supervision was shortened by SR (6.2 ± 2.0 min vs. 10.6 ± 3.5 min, p < 0.001) but total time for report creation remained unchanged (36.6 ± 12.8 min vs. 36.4 ± 11.0 min, p > 0.05). Factual accuracy of residents’ SR was deemed higher (8.0/9.5 vs. 7.0/7.0, p = 0.006/ < 0.001). In conclusion, SR has the potential to improve report quality and workflow efficiency for lower extremity CTA.
DOI:doi:10.3390/diagnostics14171968
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171968
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/17/1968
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171968
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:computed tomography angiography
 lower extremity CT angiography
 peripheral arterial disease
 report quality
 structured reporting
K10plus-PPN:1916402437
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69300997   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang