Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators

• Verfasst von: Poß-Doering, Regina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Koetsenruijter, Jan [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Litke, Nicola [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Weis, Aline [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Köppen, Martina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kümmel, Stephanie [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Szecsenyi, Joachim [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wensing, Michel [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Strengthening crisis resilience in German primary care by using quality indicators
• Titelzusatz: findings of a process evaluation in the RESILARE project
• Verf.angabe: Regina Poß-Doering, Jan Koetsenruijter, Nicola Alexandra Litke, Aline Weis, Martina Köppen, Stephanie Kümmel, Joachim Szecsenyi and Michel Wensing
• E-Jahr: 2024
• Jahr: 08 October 2024
• Umfang: 12 S.
• Illustrationen: Illustrationen
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 01.04.2025
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Archives of public health
• Ort Quelle: Bruxelles : Archives, 1997
• Jahr Quelle: 2024
• Band/Heft Quelle: 82(2024), 1, Seite 1-12
• ISSN Quelle: 2049-3258
• DOI: doi:10.1186/s13690-024-01400-7
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1920957936

Abstract

In recent years, health systems worldwide have been confronted with several crises such as natural disasters or the COVID-19 pandemic, that affected lives and health of many people. In light of waves of infections and heat, climate change is considered to be the biggest health threat of the 21st century. Strengthening individual and organizational crisis resilience in healthcare settings thus becomes a crucial factor in maintaining care quality and protecting vulnerable patients during such crises. The RESILARE project therefore aimed to develop and evaluate quality indicators that support primary care practices in preparing for and adapting to crisis-related challenges. In a three-phased process, indicator development was based on systematic literature research and qualitative data, a two-stage expert panel process, and pilot testing in a maximum of n = 35 ambulatory practices during an outreach visit. Practice-individual indicator-related status and benchmarking information were provided via feedback reports to complete the audit and feedback program. A mixed-methods process evaluation used semistructured interviews with participating General practitioners and nonphysician health professionals to explore support and challenges for the implementation of the derived set of quality indicators. Two online surveys were conducted to evaluate all indicators and the two-part feedback report. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively using a thematic analysis approach. Survey data were analyzed descriptively. A total of n = 32 indicators covered four domains: (1) individual resilience, (2) crisis prevention, (3) organizational resilience, and (4) climate resilience. N = 34 practices participated in the piloting and the process evaluation. Participants generally attributed a high relevance to the domains, and considered the indicator set suitable for implementation into existing quality management systems. Planning and implementation of measures that strengthen crisis resilience in practices were triggered or intensified by piloting the indicators and by the two-part feedback report. The identified challenges involved the volume of indicators and practice-individual implementation of renewable energy sources on rented premises. Participants expressed their desire for peer exchange regarding proven concepts for crisis resilience.