Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Renkert-Baudis, Miriam [VerfasserIn]   i
 Günter, Florentine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mohr, Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
 Maurer, Kristina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klinke Petrowsky, Michaela [VerfasserIn]   i
 Boettcher, Michael [VerfasserIn]   i
 Elrod, Julia [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Nanocellulose significantly reduces number of anesthetics, hospital days, and in-patient dressing changes compared to PU-Foam Dressing
Titelzusatz:a prospective cohort study in children
Verf.angabe:Miriam Renkert, Florentine Günter, Christoph Mohr, Kristina Maurer, Merely Michaela Klinke Petrowsky, Michael Boettcher, Julia Elrod
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:December 2024
Umfang:10 S.
Fussnoten:Online verfügbar: 9. Juli 2024, Artikelversion: 5. Dezember 2024 ; Gesehen am 17.04.2025
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Burns
Ort Quelle:Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1974
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:50(2024), 9 vom: Dez., Artikel-ID 107206, Seite 1-10
ISSN Quelle:1879-1409
Abstract:Background - Pediatric thermal injuries can have profound physical and psychological effects. Long-term care, including wound dressing selection, significantly impacts outcomes. This study compared treatment related variables and long-term results of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) and polyurethane foam (PU-foam) dressings in pediatric burn care. - Methods - A prospective cohort study comparing BNC (2018-2020) and PU-foam (2016-2018) in pediatric burn patients. Data included demographics, wound characteristics, infection rates, treatment duration, anesthesia procedures, dressing changes, scar assessments (POSAS, VSS), colorimeter measurements, and quality of life (CDLQI). Regression analyses were performed to correct for differences in burn depth. - Results - After correction for burn depth, BNC showed a shorter hospital stay duration (p = 0.007), a lower number of procedures under general anesthesia (p<0.0001) and a reduced number of inpatient dressing changes (p = 0.006), compared to PU-foam, whereas wound infection rates did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.169). Scar outcomes (POSAS, VSS, colorimeter measurements) and quality of life (CDLQI) were comparable for both treatments. - Discussion - BNC dressing benefits include significantly fewer anesthesia procedures, a reduced number of inpatient dressing changes and a shorter hospital stays, supporting the use of BNC dressing. Long-term scar outcomes with BNC are comparable to established dressings like PU-foam. Further randomized trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.010
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.010
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417924002080
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.07.010
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Burns
 Pediatrics
 POSAS
 Scar
 Skin
 Wound dressing
K10plus-PPN:1923093355
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69331926   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang