“Empathy for children is often missing”

• Verfasst von: Nguyen, Van-Kinh [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Baum, Nina [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Bärnighausen, Till [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: “Empathy for children is often missing”
• Titelzusatz: a mixed methods analysis of a German forum on COVID-19 pandemic measures
• Verf.angabe: Văn Kính Nguyễn, Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Nina Baum and Till Bärnighausen
• E-Jahr: 2024
• Jahr: 12 October 2024
• Umfang: 15 S.
• Illustrationen: Illustrationen
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 30.04.2025
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: BMC public health
• Ort Quelle: London : BioMed Central, 2001
• Jahr Quelle: 2024
• Band/Heft Quelle: 24(2024), Artikel-ID 2795, Seite 1-15
• ISSN Quelle: 1471-2458
• DOI: doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20296-0
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Children
• Sach-SW: Clustering
• Sach-SW: COVID-19
• Sach-SW: Embeddings
• Sach-SW: Families
• Sach-SW: Pandemic preparedness
• Sach-SW: Qualitative
• Sach-SW: Vaccination
• K10plus-PPN: 192399316X

Abstract

Background: The pandemic and its preventive measures disrupted daily routines and posed unforeseen obstaclesfor families. Users of public online forums chronicled these challenges by freely expressing their sentiments in unrestricted text‑length formats. We explored a German COVID‑19 forum to understand family perspectives and experiences of pandemic measures, particularly in terms of testing and vaccinating children. Our findings aim to informfuture epidemic health policies.Methods: We retrieved all 11,207 entries from a COVID‑19 forum during its lifespan (June 2020 ‑ December 2021), posted during the height of the pandemic. We classified the entries into topic clusters including general pandemic situation, testing, or vaccination using state‑of‑the‑art text embeddings and clustering algorithms. The clusters were selected based on the research’s aims and analysed qualitatively using a health policy triangle framework. Results: Users generally appreciated pandemic public health safety measures for everyone’s protection, yet voiced concerns about inconsistent policies and disproportional disadvantages for children compared to other societal groups, like the elderly. Non‑compliers were overwhelmingly regarded with skepticism and critiqued. Users found COVID‑19 (exit) strategies and information about the benefits of vaccination unclear. This created hurdles for parents and caregivers in navigating their children’s school and social life. Users endorsed vaccinating children mainly for “normalising” children’s lives rather than for their physical health benefits. Some users suggested prioritising teachers and early childhood educators on the vaccination eligibility list to speed up a return to “normality”. Conclusions: During pandemics, governments should prioritize addressing the societal and mental health needs of children by implementing participatory and family‑oriented public health measures for schools and kindergartens. Clear communication coupled with consistent design and implementation of safety measures and regulations, would be crucial for building trust in the general population and for ensuring compliance regarding testing and vaccination. Communicating the benefits and risks of vaccinating children is of paramount importance for informed decision‑making among parents. In future epidemics, computer‑aided analysis of large online qualitative data would offer valuable insights into public sentiments and concerns, enabling proactive and adaptive epidemic responses.